On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 11:49:57AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: >> general ack for the x86 bits, but i'm not sure whether we should be >> pushing this upstream so late in the cycle. If we do it in the next >> cycle then it's best we do it in the x86 tree, the KVM impact seems >> much smaller than the general x86 impact. >> > > It certainly doesn't fall under the recent regression rule, and there's > a simple workaround (rmmod -r kvm) so I agree it's best to defer for the > next cycle.
Shouldn't reboot=kbd be the default again still during this cycle, then? The cases where the new reboot=acpi default broke didn't necessarily involve KVM. -- Eduardo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html