Ingo Molnar wrote:
general ack for the x86 bits, but i'm not sure whether we should be pushing this upstream so late in the cycle. If we do it in the next cycle then it's best we do it in the x86 tree, the KVM impact seems much smaller than the general x86 impact.
It certainly doesn't fall under the recent regression rule, and there's a simple workaround (rmmod -r kvm) so I agree it's best to defer for the next cycle.
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
