Am Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:17:07 +0100 schrieb heica...@linux.vnet.ibm.com: > Why don't you just remove the printk? IMHO it's rather pointless. It is'nt: It infoms the user why his guest is going to crash even though it has performed an operation that is perfectly legal according to the spec. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
- [PATCH 0/3] kvm-s390: three kernel fixes Christian Borntraeger
- [PATCH 2/3] kvm-s390: Fix problem state check f... Christian Borntraeger
- [PATCH 3/3] kvm-s390: Fix SIGP set prefix ioctl Christian Borntraeger
- [PATCH 1/3] kvm-s390: Fix printk on SIGP set ar... Christian Borntraeger
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kvm-s390: Fix printk on SIG... Heiko Carstens
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kvm-s390: Fix printk on... Carsten Otte
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kvm-s390: Fix print... Heiko Carstens
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kvm-s390: Fix ... Avi Kivity
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kvm-s390: ... Carsten Otte
- [PATCH 1/3 v2] kvm-s390: F... Christian Borntraeger
- Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] kvm... Avi Kivity
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kvm-s390: Fix printk on SIG... Amit Shah