On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:26:11 +0100 Carsten Otte <co...@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> Am Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:17:07 +0100 > schrieb heica...@linux.vnet.ibm.com: > > Why don't you just remove the printk? IMHO it's rather pointless. > It is'nt: It infoms the user why his guest is going to crash > even though it has performed an operation that is perfectly > legal according to the spec. If you have hundreds of guests running, how do you get the connection from this message to a specific user process? Informing a user process that it did something that isn't allowed or supported is usually done by returning an appropriate return code. Also, if you have one "evil" process and hit the prink_limit the messages for all other processes will likely be lost anyway. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
