On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 04:49:18PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> This improves the IRQ forwarding for assigned devices: By using the
> kernel's threaded IRQ scheme, we can get rid of the latency-prone work
> queue and simplify the code in the same run.
Interesting. Do you see any latency improvements from this?
> Moreover, we no longer have to hold assigned_dev_lock while raising the
> guest IRQ, which can be a lenghty operation as we may have to iterate
> over all VCPUs. The lock is now only used for synchronizing masking vs.
> unmasking of INTx-type IRQs, thus is renames to intx_lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com>
> ---
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 12 +----
> virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c | 106 ++++++++++++++-------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index 462b982..a786419 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -456,16 +456,8 @@ struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier {
> void (*irq_acked)(struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier *kian);
> };
>
> -#define KVM_ASSIGNED_MSIX_PENDING 0x1
> -struct kvm_guest_msix_entry {
> - u32 vector;
> - u16 entry;
> - u16 flags;
> -};
> -
> struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel {
> struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier ack_notifier;
> - struct work_struct interrupt_work;
> struct list_head list;
> int assigned_dev_id;
> int host_segnr;
> @@ -476,13 +468,13 @@ struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel {
> bool host_irq_disabled;
> struct msix_entry *host_msix_entries;
> int guest_irq;
> - struct kvm_guest_msix_entry *guest_msix_entries;
> + struct msix_entry *guest_msix_entries;
> unsigned long irq_requested_type;
> int irq_source_id;
> int flags;
> struct pci_dev *dev;
> struct kvm *kvm;
> - spinlock_t assigned_dev_lock;
> + spinlock_t intx_lock;
> };
>
> struct kvm_irq_mask_notifier {
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c b/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
> index ecc4419..d0b07ea 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
> @@ -55,58 +55,31 @@ static int find_index_from_host_irq(struct
> kvm_assigned_dev_kernel
> return index;
> }
>
> -static void kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> +static irqreturn_t kvm_assigned_dev_thread(int irq, void *dev_id)
> {
> - struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *assigned_dev;
> - int i;
> + struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *assigned_dev = dev_id;
> + u32 vector;
> + int index;
>
> - assigned_dev = container_of(work, struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel,
> - interrupt_work);
> + if (assigned_dev->irq_requested_type & KVM_DEV_IRQ_HOST_INTX) {
> + spin_lock(&assigned_dev->intx_lock);
> + disable_irq_nosync(irq);
> + assigned_dev->host_irq_disabled = true;
> + spin_unlock(&assigned_dev->intx_lock);
> + }
>
> - spin_lock_irq(&assigned_dev->assigned_dev_lock);
> if (assigned_dev->irq_requested_type & KVM_DEV_IRQ_HOST_MSIX) {
> - struct kvm_guest_msix_entry *guest_entries =
> - assigned_dev->guest_msix_entries;
> - for (i = 0; i < assigned_dev->entries_nr; i++) {
> - if (!(guest_entries[i].flags &
> - KVM_ASSIGNED_MSIX_PENDING))
> - continue;
> - guest_entries[i].flags &= ~KVM_ASSIGNED_MSIX_PENDING;
> + index = find_index_from_host_irq(assigned_dev, irq);
> + if (index >= 0) {
> + vector = assigned_dev->
> + guest_msix_entries[index].vector;
> kvm_set_irq(assigned_dev->kvm,
> - assigned_dev->irq_source_id,
> - guest_entries[i].vector, 1);
> + assigned_dev->irq_source_id, vector, 1);
> }
> } else
> kvm_set_irq(assigned_dev->kvm, assigned_dev->irq_source_id,
> assigned_dev->guest_irq, 1);
>
> - spin_unlock_irq(&assigned_dev->assigned_dev_lock);
> -}
> -
> -static irqreturn_t kvm_assigned_dev_intr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> -{
> - unsigned long flags;
> - struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *assigned_dev =
> - (struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *) dev_id;
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&assigned_dev->assigned_dev_lock, flags);
> - if (assigned_dev->irq_requested_type & KVM_DEV_IRQ_HOST_MSIX) {
> - int index = find_index_from_host_irq(assigned_dev, irq);
> - if (index < 0)
> - goto out;
> - assigned_dev->guest_msix_entries[index].flags |=
> - KVM_ASSIGNED_MSIX_PENDING;
> - }
> -
> - schedule_work(&assigned_dev->interrupt_work);
> -
> - if (assigned_dev->irq_requested_type & KVM_DEV_IRQ_GUEST_INTX) {
> - disable_irq_nosync(irq);
> - assigned_dev->host_irq_disabled = true;
> - }
> -
> -out:
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&assigned_dev->assigned_dev_lock, flags);
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> @@ -114,7 +87,6 @@ out:
> static void kvm_assigned_dev_ack_irq(struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier *kian)
> {
> struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *dev;
> - unsigned long flags;
>
> if (kian->gsi == -1)
> return;
> @@ -127,12 +99,12 @@ static void kvm_assigned_dev_ack_irq(struct
> kvm_irq_ack_notifier *kian)
> /* The guest irq may be shared so this ack may be
> * from another device.
> */
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->assigned_dev_lock, flags);
> + spin_lock(&dev->intx_lock);
> if (dev->host_irq_disabled) {
> enable_irq(dev->host_irq);
> dev->host_irq_disabled = false;
> }
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->assigned_dev_lock, flags);
> + spin_unlock(&dev->intx_lock);
> }
>
> static void deassign_guest_irq(struct kvm *kvm,
> @@ -155,28 +127,19 @@ static void deassign_host_irq(struct kvm *kvm,
> struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *assigned_dev)
> {
> /*
> - * In kvm_free_device_irq, cancel_work_sync return true if:
> - * 1. work is scheduled, and then cancelled.
> - * 2. work callback is executed.
> - *
> - * The first one ensured that the irq is disabled and no more events
> - * would happen. But for the second one, the irq may be enabled (e.g.
> - * for MSI). So we disable irq here to prevent further events.
> + * We disable irq here to prevent further events.
> *
> * Notice this maybe result in nested disable if the interrupt type is
> * INTx, but it's OK for we are going to free it.
> *
> * If this function is a part of VM destroy, please ensure that till
> * now, the kvm state is still legal for probably we also have to wait
> - * interrupt_work done.
> + * on a currently running IRQ handler.
> */
> if (assigned_dev->irq_requested_type & KVM_DEV_IRQ_HOST_MSIX) {
> int i;
> for (i = 0; i < assigned_dev->entries_nr; i++)
> - disable_irq_nosync(assigned_dev->
> - host_msix_entries[i].vector);
> -
> - cancel_work_sync(&assigned_dev->interrupt_work);
> + disable_irq(assigned_dev->host_msix_entries[i].vector);
>
> for (i = 0; i < assigned_dev->entries_nr; i++)
> free_irq(assigned_dev->host_msix_entries[i].vector,
> @@ -188,8 +151,7 @@ static void deassign_host_irq(struct kvm *kvm,
> pci_disable_msix(assigned_dev->dev);
> } else {
> /* Deal with MSI and INTx */
> - disable_irq_nosync(assigned_dev->host_irq);
> - cancel_work_sync(&assigned_dev->interrupt_work);
> + disable_irq(assigned_dev->host_irq);
>
> free_irq(assigned_dev->host_irq, (void *)assigned_dev);
>
> @@ -268,8 +230,8 @@ static int assigned_device_enable_host_intx(struct kvm
> *kvm,
> * on the same interrupt line is not a happy situation: there
> * are going to be long delays in accepting, acking, etc.
> */
> - if (request_irq(dev->host_irq, kvm_assigned_dev_intr,
> - 0, "kvm_assigned_intx_device", (void *)dev))
> + if (request_threaded_irq(dev->host_irq, NULL, kvm_assigned_dev_thread,
> + 0, "kvm_assigned_intx_device", (void *)dev))
> return -EIO;
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -287,8 +249,8 @@ static int assigned_device_enable_host_msi(struct kvm
> *kvm,
> }
>
> dev->host_irq = dev->dev->irq;
> - if (request_irq(dev->host_irq, kvm_assigned_dev_intr, 0,
> - "kvm_assigned_msi_device", (void *)dev)) {
> + if (request_threaded_irq(dev->host_irq, NULL, kvm_assigned_dev_thread,
> + 0, "kvm_assigned_msi_device", (void *)dev)) {
> pci_disable_msi(dev->dev);
> return -EIO;
> }
> @@ -313,10 +275,10 @@ static int assigned_device_enable_host_msix(struct kvm
> *kvm,
> return r;
>
> for (i = 0; i < dev->entries_nr; i++) {
> - r = request_irq(dev->host_msix_entries[i].vector,
> - kvm_assigned_dev_intr, 0,
> - "kvm_assigned_msix_device",
> - (void *)dev);
> + r = request_threaded_irq(dev->host_msix_entries[i].vector,
> + NULL, kvm_assigned_dev_thread,
> + 0, "kvm_assigned_msix_device",
> + (void *)dev);
> if (r)
> goto err;
> }
> @@ -557,12 +519,10 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_assign_device(struct kvm *kvm,
> match->host_devfn = assigned_dev->devfn;
> match->flags = assigned_dev->flags;
> match->dev = dev;
> - spin_lock_init(&match->assigned_dev_lock);
> + spin_lock_init(&match->intx_lock);
> match->irq_source_id = -1;
> match->kvm = kvm;
> match->ack_notifier.irq_acked = kvm_assigned_dev_ack_irq;
> - INIT_WORK(&match->interrupt_work,
> - kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handler);
>
> list_add(&match->list, &kvm->arch.assigned_dev_head);
>
> @@ -654,9 +614,9 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_set_msix_nr(struct kvm *kvm,
> r = -ENOMEM;
> goto msix_nr_out;
> }
> - adev->guest_msix_entries = kzalloc(
> - sizeof(struct kvm_guest_msix_entry) *
> - entry_nr->entry_nr, GFP_KERNEL);
> + adev->guest_msix_entries =
> + kzalloc(sizeof(struct msix_entry) * entry_nr->entry_nr,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!adev->guest_msix_entries) {
> kfree(adev->host_msix_entries);
> r = -ENOMEM;
> --
> 1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
