Am 02.11.2010 19:40, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>>> @@ -199,6 +343,13 @@ static void kvm_free_assigned_device(struct kvm *kvm, >>>>> >>>>> pci_reset_function(assigned_dev->dev); >>>>> >>>>> + /* >>>>> + * Unmask the IRQ at PCI level once the reset is done - the next user >>>>> + * may not expect the IRQ being masked. >>>>> + */ >>>>> + if (assigned_dev->pci_2_3) >>>>> + pci_2_3_irq_unmask(assigned_dev->dev); >>>>> + >>>> >>>> Doesn't pci_reset_function clear mask bit? It seems to ... >>> >>> I was left with non-functional devices for the host here if I was not >>> doing this. Need to recheck, but I think it was required. >> >> Interesting. Could you check why please? >> > > Can't reproduce anymore. This was early code, maybe affected by some > bits or buts that no longer exist. > > Spec says it's cleared on reset, so I removed those lines now. >
Hmpf, it just happened again: Guest was using my ath9k, I killed the guest, lspci says DisINTx+. Strange. Is anyone (qemu) restoring the config space after the reset, bringing the disable bit back? Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
