Hi Tyler Baicar,

On 2017/3/7 4:45, Tyler Baicar wrote:
> Currently there are trace events for the various RAS
> errors with the exception of ARM processor type errors.
> Add a new trace event for such errors so that the user
> will know when they occur. These trace events are
> consistent with the ARM processor error section type
> defined in UEFI 2.6 spec section N.2.4.4.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbai...@codeaurora.org>
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c    |  8 +++++++-
>  drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c |  1 +
>  drivers/ras/ras.c           |  1 +
>  include/ras/ras_event.h     | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index 842c0cc..81d7b79 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -514,7 +514,13 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>               }
>  #endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RAS
> -             else if (trace_unknown_sec_event_enabled()) {
> +             else if (!uuid_le_cmp(sec_type, CPER_SEC_PROC_ARM) &&
> +                      trace_arm_event_enabled()) {
> +                     struct cper_sec_proc_arm *arm_err;
> +
> +                     arm_err = acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(gdata);
> +                     trace_arm_event(arm_err);
> +             } else if (trace_unknown_sec_event_enabled()) {
>                       void *unknown_err = 
> acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(gdata);
>                       trace_unknown_sec_event(&sec_type,
>                                       fru_id, fru_text, sec_sev,
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> index 545a6c2..e9fb56a 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
>  #include <linux/printk.h>
>  #include <linux/bcd.h>
>  #include <acpi/ghes.h>
> +#include <ras/ras_event.h>
>  
>  #define INDENT_SP    " "
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/ras/ras.c b/drivers/ras/ras.c
> index fb2500b..8ba5a94 100644
> --- a/drivers/ras/ras.c
> +++ b/drivers/ras/ras.c
> @@ -28,3 +28,4 @@ static int __init ras_init(void)
>  #endif
>  EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(mc_event);
>  EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(unknown_sec_event);
> +EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_event);
> diff --git a/include/ras/ras_event.h b/include/ras/ras_event.h
> index 5861b6f..b36db48 100644
> --- a/include/ras/ras_event.h
> +++ b/include/ras/ras_event.h
> @@ -162,6 +162,40 @@
>  );
>  
>  /*
> + * ARM Processor Events Report
> + *
> + * This event is generated when hardware detects an ARM processor error
> + * has occurred. UEFI 2.6 spec section N.2.4.4.
> + */
> +TRACE_EVENT(arm_event,
> +
> +     TP_PROTO(const struct cper_sec_proc_arm *proc),
> +
> +     TP_ARGS(proc),
> +
> +     TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +             __field(u64, mpidr)
> +             __field(u64, midr)
> +             __field(u32, running_state)
> +             __field(u32, psci_state)
> +             __field(u8, affinity)
> +     ),
> +
> +     TP_fast_assign(
> +             __entry->affinity = proc->affinity_level;
> +             __entry->mpidr = proc->mpidr;
> +             __entry->midr = proc->midr;
> +             __entry->running_state = proc->running_state;
> +             __entry->psci_state = proc->psci_state;
> +     ),
> +
> +     TP_printk("affinity level: %d; MPIDR: %016llx; MIDR: %016llx; "
> +               "running state: %d; PSCI state: %d",
> +               __entry->affinity, __entry->mpidr, __entry->midr,
> +               __entry->running_state, __entry->psci_state)
> +);
> +

I think these fields are not enough, we need also export arm processor error
information (UEFI 2.6 spec section N.2.4.4.1), or at least the error type,
address, etc. So that the userspace (such as rasdaemon tool) could know what
error occurred.

Thanks,
Xie XiuQi

> +/*
>   * Unknown Section Report
>   *
>   * This event is generated when hardware detected a hardware
> 

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to