Hi Suzuki,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poul...@arm.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 6:12 PM
> To: Jianyong Wu (Arm Technology China) <jianyong...@arm.com>;
> net...@vger.kernel.org; yangbo...@nxp.com; john.stu...@linaro.org;
> t...@linutronix.de; pbonz...@redhat.com; sean.j.christopher...@intel.com;
> m...@kernel.org; richardcoch...@gmail.com; Mark Rutland
> <mark.rutl...@arm.com>; Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; k...@vger.kernel.org; Steve Capper
> <steve.cap...@arm.com>; Kaly Xin (Arm Technology China)
> <kaly....@arm.com>; Justin He (Arm Technology China)
> <justin...@arm.com>; nd <n...@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/5] ptp: Reorganize ptp_kvm modules to make it
> arch-independent.
>
>
>
> On 27/09/2019 11:10, Jianyong Wu (Arm Technology China) wrote:
> > Hi Suzuki,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poul...@arm.com>
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 9:06 PM
> >> To: Jianyong Wu (Arm Technology China) <jianyong...@arm.com>;
> >> net...@vger.kernel.org; yangbo...@nxp.com; john.stu...@linaro.org;
> >> t...@linutronix.de; pbonz...@redhat.com;
> >> sean.j.christopher...@intel.com; m...@kernel.org;
> >> richardcoch...@gmail.com; Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>;
> Will
> >> Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
> >> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> >> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
> >> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; k...@vger.kernel.org; Steve Capper
> >> <steve.cap...@arm.com>; Kaly Xin (Arm Technology China)
> >> <kaly....@arm.com>; Justin He (Arm Technology China)
> >> <justin...@arm.com>; nd <n...@arm.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/5] ptp: Reorganize ptp_kvm modules to
> >> make it arch-independent.
> >>
> >> Hi Jianyong,
> >>
> >> On 26/09/2019 12:42, Jianyong Wu wrote:
> >>> Currently, ptp_kvm modules implementation is only for x86 which
> >>> includs large part of arch-specific code. This patch move all of
> >>> those code into new arch related file in the same directory.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong...@arm.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/ptp/Makefile | 1 +
> >>> drivers/ptp/{ptp_kvm.c => kvm_ptp.c} | 77 ++++++------------------
> >>> drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_x86.c | 87
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h | 12 ++++
> >>> 4 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> >>> rename drivers/ptp/{ptp_kvm.c => kvm_ptp.c} (63%)
> >>
> >> minor nit: Could we not skip renaming the file ? Given you are
> >> following the
> >> ptp_kvm_* for the arch specific files and the header files, wouldn't
> >> it be good to keep ptp_kvm.c ?
> >>
> > If the module name ptp_kvm.ko is the same with its dependent object
> > file ptp_kvm.o, warning will be given by compiler, So I change the
> ptp_kvm.c to kvm_ptp.c to avoid that conflict.
>
> Hmm, ok. How about ptp_kvm_common.c instead of kvm_ptp.c ?
Yeah, it's a better name, I will change it next version.
Thanks
Jianyong Wu
>
> Suzuki
