Oh ok.

-Amit








On 4/22/16, 11:31 AM, "Luis Gomez" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi Amit, the idea we discussed in the l2switch call is to combine both: 
>ofplugin patch to change features [1] + l2switch patch do deal with new plugin 
>[2]. For that we had to remove any feature change in [2].
>
>[1] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/35892/
>[2] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/33303/
>
>BR/Luis
>
>> On Apr 22, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Amit Mandke (ammandke) <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> @Sai - what happened to the pom and feature changes in this patch. I don’t 
>> see those anymore in the commit? How would this change in to Li feature? Am 
>> I missing something?
>> 
>> -Amit
>> 
>> 
>> From: Sai MarapaReddy <[email protected]>
>> Date: Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 10:17 AM
>> To: Amit Mandke <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Luis Gomez <[email protected]>, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]>, 
>> OpenDayLight-L2switch-Dev <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [L2switch-dev] L2switch Li issues
>> 
>> @Amit/Abhijit - Agree with you, we will likely abandon patch.
>> @Luis - I will rebase and push a patch so that it is ready for merge. 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Sai MarapaReddy
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Amit Mandke (ammandke) 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Please abandon the patch on beryllium if decision is made to not change it.
>> 
>> -Amit
>> 
>> 
>> From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Luis Gomez 
>> <[email protected]>
>> Date: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 7:31 PM
>> To: Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]>, Sai MarapaReddy 
>> <[email protected]>
>> Cc: OpenDayLight-L2switch-Dev <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [L2switch-dev] L2switch Li issues
>> 
>> Correct, we will only change plugin in master, so we will only consider: 
>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/33303/
>> 
>> Also Sai, do you know why this patch says it cannot be merged?
>> 
>> BR/Luis
>> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 20, 2016, at 4:59 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Sai,
>>> 
>>> Please don't change the default on the stable/beryllium to the Li version. 
>>> We are only changing it to default in Boron.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Abhijit
>>> 
>>> On Wednesday, April 20, 2016, Sai MarapaReddy <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>> Hi Luis,
>>> 
>>> Following are the patches for Stable/beryllium & master for L2switch. I 
>>> have change feature.xml & pom.xml to correctly point the li version.
>>> 
>>> Stable/beryllium - https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/33304/
>>> Master - https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/33303/
>>> 
>>> Could you please give it one more try with these patches ?
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> Sai MarapaReddy
>>> Brocade Communications
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Luis Gomez <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I think the table is more like this:
>>> 
>>> Case 1:  Current L2 switch (should point to OFP-He)  & Current OFP (default 
>>> plugin is OFP-He)  --> Should pass, current situation
>>> Case 2:  L2 switch with patch (should point to OFP-Li) & Current OFP 
>>> (default plugin is OFP-He)   --> Should pass if current L2switch patch 
>>> contained all fixes for Li plugin.
>>> Case 3:  Current L2 switch (should point to OFP-He) &  OFP with patch 
>>> (default plugin is OFP-Li, no -li features)   --> Should pass if L2switch 
>>> did not care about OF plugin version
>>> Case 4:  L2 switch with patch (should point to OFP-Li) &  OFP with patch 
>>> (default plugin is OFP-Li, no -li features)   --> This will never work, you 
>>> are pulling -li features which do not exist anymore in OFP.
>>> 
>>> I tested 2 & 3.
>>> 
>>>> On Apr 15, 2016, at 2:42 PM, Sai MarapaReddy <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Luis,
>>>> 
>>>> Please correct me if i am wrong here.
>>>> 
>>>> You have checked below Case 3 & Case 4 and found errors.
>>>> 
>>>> Case 3 errors :-  
>>>> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/l2switch/job/l2switch-csit-1node-switch-only-boron/291/robot/report/log.html
>>>> Case 4 erros :-  
>>>> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/l2switch/job/l2switch-csit-1node-switch-only-boron/296/robot/report/log.html
>>>> 
>>>> L2Switch Patch - https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/33304/    &  
>>>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/33303/
>>>> 
>>>> OFP Patch - https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/35892/
>>>> 
>>>> Current L2 switch code (with out patch ) points to features-openflowplugin 
>>>>  which is equivalent to OFP-he
>>>> 
>>>> Case 1:  Current L2 switch (should point to OFP-He)  & Current OFP (should 
>>>> point to OFP-He)  --> Should pass
>>>> Case 2:  L2 switch with patch (should point to OFP-Li) & Current OFP 
>>>> (should point to OFP-He)   --> Should Fail  
>>>> Case 3:  Current L2 switch (should point to OFP-He) &  OFP with patch 
>>>> (should point to OFP-Li)   --> Should Fail
>>>> Case 4:  L2 switch with patch (should point to OFP-Li) &  OFP with patch 
>>>> (should point to OFP-Li)   --> Should Pass
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Sai Reddy
>>>> Brocade Communications
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Luis Gomez <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> And this second test report is when I just apply ofplugin Li patch [2]:
>>>> 
>>>> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/l2switch/job/l2switch-csit-1node-switch-only-boron/296/robot/report/log.html
>>>> 
>>>> I see SAME issues as with l2switch Li plugin patch + some weird topology 
>>>> display issue (internal topology works as otherwise ping would not work 
>>>> but switch links are not shown) the second time we run Host Tracker test.
>>>> 
>>>> BR/Luis
>>>> 
>>>> [2] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/35892/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 13, 2016, at 7:32 PM, Luis Gomez <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> From today’s l2switch call, I got action point to run system test on Li 
>>>>> patch [1]:
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/l2switch/job/l2switch-csit-1node-switch-only-boron/291/robot/report/log.html
>>>>> 
>>>>> From the result above we can observe following issues:
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Flow push: There is no LLDP flows being pushed. Also flood flows seem 
>>>>> to be in config space because operational shows flow ID.
>>>>> - Address Tracker: All host IP addresses are seeing in all nodes, that is 
>>>>> not right, only node connected to host should show the host.
>>>>> - Host Tracker: After remove/add OpenFlow port (ovs-vsctl add-port), no 
>>>>> host is learned anymore through that port.
>>>>> - Loop Remover: Not working, using a loop topology, even when we observe 
>>>>> some ports are in DISCARD mode, mininet sees DUP packets.
>>>>> 
>>>>> BR/Luis
>>>>> 
>>>>> [1] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/33303/
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> L2switch-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/l2switch-dev
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>
_______________________________________________
L2switch-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/l2switch-dev

Reply via email to