Please abandon the patch on beryllium if decision is made to not change it.
-Amit From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Luis Gomez <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 7:31 PM To: Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Sai MarapaReddy <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: OpenDayLight-L2switch-Dev <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [L2switch-dev] L2switch Li issues Correct, we will only change plugin in master, so we will only consider: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/33303/ Also Sai, do you know why this patch says it cannot be merged? BR/Luis On Apr 20, 2016, at 4:59 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Sai, Please don't change the default on the stable/beryllium to the Li version. We are only changing it to default in Boron. Thanks, Abhijit On Wednesday, April 20, 2016, Sai MarapaReddy <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Luis, Following are the patches for Stable/beryllium & master for L2switch. I have change feature.xml & pom.xml to correctly point the li version. Stable/beryllium - https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/33304/ Master - https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/33303/ Could you please give it one more try with these patches ? Regards Sai MarapaReddy Brocade Communications On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Luis Gomez <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: I think the table is more like this: Case 1: Current L2 switch (should point to OFP-He) & Current OFP (default plugin is OFP-He) --> Should pass, current situation Case 2: L2 switch with patch (should point to OFP-Li) & Current OFP (default plugin is OFP-He) --> Should pass if current L2switch patch contained all fixes for Li plugin. Case 3: Current L2 switch (should point to OFP-He) & OFP with patch (default plugin is OFP-Li, no -li features) --> Should pass if L2switch did not care about OF plugin version Case 4: L2 switch with patch (should point to OFP-Li) & OFP with patch (default plugin is OFP-Li, no -li features) --> This will never work, you are pulling -li features which do not exist anymore in OFP. I tested 2 & 3. On Apr 15, 2016, at 2:42 PM, Sai MarapaReddy <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: Hi Luis, Please correct me if i am wrong here. You have checked below Case 3 & Case 4 and found errors. Case 3 errors :- https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/l2switch/job/l2switch-csit-1node-switch-only-boron/291/robot/report/log.html Case 4 erros :- https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/l2switch/job/l2switch-csit-1node-switch-only-boron/296/robot/report/log.html L2Switch Patch - https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/33304/ & https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/33303/ OFP Patch - https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/35892/ Current L2 switch code (with out patch ) points to features-openflowplugin which is equivalent to OFP-he Case 1: Current L2 switch (should point to OFP-He) & Current OFP (should point to OFP-He) --> Should pass Case 2: L2 switch with patch (should point to OFP-Li) & Current OFP (should point to OFP-He) --> Should Fail Case 3: Current L2 switch (should point to OFP-He) & OFP with patch (should point to OFP-Li) --> Should Fail Case 4: L2 switch with patch (should point to OFP-Li) & OFP with patch (should point to OFP-Li) --> Should Pass Regards, Sai Reddy Brocade Communications On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Luis Gomez <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: And this second test report is when I just apply ofplugin Li patch [2]: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/l2switch/job/l2switch-csit-1node-switch-only-boron/296/robot/report/log.html I see SAME issues as with l2switch Li plugin patch + some weird topology display issue (internal topology works as otherwise ping would not work but switch links are not shown) the second time we run Host Tracker test. BR/Luis [2] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/35892/ On Apr 13, 2016, at 7:32 PM, Luis Gomez <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: From today’s l2switch call, I got action point to run system test on Li patch [1]: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/l2switch/job/l2switch-csit-1node-switch-only-boron/291/robot/report/log.html From the result above we can observe following issues: - Flow push: There is no LLDP flows being pushed. Also flood flows seem to be in config space because operational shows flow ID. - Address Tracker: All host IP addresses are seeing in all nodes, that is not right, only node connected to host should show the host. - Host Tracker: After remove/add OpenFlow port (ovs-vsctl add-port), no host is learned anymore through that port. - Loop Remover: Not working, using a loop topology, even when we observe some ports are in DISCARD mode, mininet sees DUP packets. BR/Luis [1] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/33303/ _______________________________________________ L2switch-dev mailing list [email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/l2switch-dev
_______________________________________________ L2switch-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/l2switch-dev
