On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 21:02 +0100, ness wrote: > Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 15:02 +0100, ness wrote: > > > >>The problem Jonathan pointed out is that *others* will delay. This is > >>not the case, as the server will be multithreaded. > > > > > > I think that this reply and mine crossed in the mail, but just in case: > > > > Not if you want that server to be remotely robust, it won't. > > > > Could you elaborate a bit on this? I see there is a problem wenn calling > a remote object the way I discribed, this would at least require > handling at a higher level.
See my earlier comment about the engineering risks of multithreading. _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
