On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 15:22 +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote: > > So yes, I think we can dramatically increase the magnitude of the > > problem with just about any form of concurrency you care to try. We can > > convert a program that was not real time into a program that is both not > > real time and now is subject to storage denial of resource too! > > Such state is indeed needed in this case. But it can be stored on > client-supplied memory. What is needed is that the state is copied into a > static server buffer when starting to handle the request, and copying it back > when the request is delayed again. At those two moment do we need to accept > page faults, because the client can misbehave or be destroyed. For the rest, > I think everything should be normal.
Bas: You build yours, and I will build mine. Mine will be in production two years before yours is debugged enough to ship, and yours will *never* be bug free. shap _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
