Hi, > In fact, I strongly agree with Olaf: Anybody who wants to help with > design issues should make sure they understand the Hurd on Mach well > enough to see the strengths and weaknesses.
Now this surprises me. When I suggested a while back to point "idling" Hurd/L4 developers to take a look at Hurd/Mach, you were strongly against it. Am I missing something, or did you change your opinion on that?... Anyways, glad you agree now :-) -antrik- _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
