<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> In fact, I strongly agree with Olaf: Anybody who wants to help with >> design issues should make sure they understand the Hurd on Mach well >> enough to see the strengths and weaknesses. > > Now this surprises me. When I suggested a while back to point "idling" > Hurd/L4 developers to take a look at Hurd/Mach, you were strongly > against it. Am I missing something, or did you change your opinion on > that?...
This does not surprise me. Marcus never said such thing. He just said that Mach is not the way to go (so for the long term). -- Marco _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
