[Tom Bachmann]
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Matheus Morais wrote:
>>
>> On 4/11/06, *Tom Bachmann* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> hurd/pistachio is considered dead. We're currently looking at
>> another (not-yet-existing) microkernel called coyotos.
>> - --
>> - -ness-
>>
>>
>> In fact, the Hurd on top of L4 microkernel isnt completly dead yet,
>> it's just stalled. Indeed if Coyotos will be build with successful
>> to run Hurd on top of it, L4-Hurd could be considered
>> dead. Currently we can use L4-Hurd as an 'plan B' if Coyotos fail.
>>
> I'd like to clarify that I was not speaking about hurd/l4 but about
> hurd/pistachio (i.e. pistachio the specific l4 implementation),
> hurd/pistachio _is_ dead.
Just out of curiosity; what L4 implementation were you considering to
use then?
eSk
_______________________________________________
L4-hurd mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
