On 4/12/06, Leonardo Pereira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2006/4/11, Wei Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > It is exciting to see so many replies and comments. > > > > > > But I think I have to start from the beginning - so far as I know, Coyotos > is also with doubts (so is L4.sec). Is there any schedule for a working > release, and for hurd on Coyotos? > > It is impossible since there is no Coyotos working right now, anyway, Shap > said that he will have a kernel working on June, so, after that, it is > possible that the job on ngHurd can start. Marcus said that in 6 months > after a first coyotos release he will be able to say if ngHurd is viable on > Coyotos.
Is There a mailing-list of some sort to follow the progress of Hurd/Coyotos? l4-hurd doesn't seem like the right place for it... I might be able to set this up, if needed. - Jouke > > > > > I also feel unconfident of the performance and compatibility of a > KeyKOS-like OS. It is of a completely novel architecture. Do you really > think it will accord with the goal (which I think is a general purpose OS) > of hurd and GNU? > > I am fully aware of that performance and compatibility problems. > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Wei > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > L4-hurd mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd > > > > > _______________________________________________ > L4-hurd mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd > > > _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
