----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Bachmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: Hurd and microkernels
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think building an own kernel instead, while it might be more work
(though I'm not really sure about that), would allow concentrating on
how *we* want the system to work, instead of following some microkernel
designers' ideas about how systems should be build... Might very well be
worth trying for a change.
I'm sorry, but we do have a ``micro''-kernel (mach), but I can't see the
benefits you're hoping for.
- --
- -ness-
Well Marcus and Neal have admittedly stated they don't have time to work on
Hurdng at the moment and very few folks seem to want to ( or in my case lack
the skillsets ) to do the hardcore Mach work, so what could it hurt?
Barry deFreese (aka bddebian)
_______________________________________________
L4-hurd mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
