On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 06:06 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> (As an interesting side note, I can't think of a *single* example of a
> system built on a third party microkernel, that ever gained any
> commercial, academic or other relevance -- besides of serving as bad
> examples, of course ;-) )

I do not care for Mach, but it is certainly a counter-example to this
statement. Also, nearly every widely shipped embedded system is a
counter-example.



_______________________________________________
L4-hurd mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd

Reply via email to