-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > 1. Incoming messages on any valid, unblocked FCRB. > 2. Especially, incoming idempotent messages. > > So one way to guard against a failing server is to use idempotent timer > events to implement a "heartbeat" -- in much the way that TCP does. >
I don't get it. What do we gain from artificially awaking M? Is the FCRB->M C invoked still blocked after step 5? - -- - -ness- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFETRzyvD/ijq9JWhsRAm49AJ9FVCB0N4ALgGPxrz84UdbHaUmx9gCffElW qplRIbQTo78Gr7/6CSMWosQ= =htFQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
