Scribit Pierre THIERRY dies 22/04/2006 hora 17:35: > I'm not familiar at all with the use of capabilities by a program, but > couldn't S drop it's capability in a way that won't trigger the send > that the "invoke on delete" bit asks for?
I reply to myself (mea culpa, for I didn't read all the thread before sending my mail): IIUC, that would enable a malicious S to let C be waiting indefinitely for the answer, never getting it nor any notification that no answer will ever be able to reach it (because the reply capability is not owned by anyone or because the owner is destroyed). Am I right? Quickly, Nowhere man -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
