On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 00:19 +0200, Pierre THIERRY wrote: > Scribit Jonathan S. Shapiro dies 22/04/2006 hora 11:11: > > 1. There is a desire for pinning, but no workable design exists. > > How do other systems deal with what we need pinning for without pinning, > or why is their design of pinning not usable?
No design exists that deals reasonably with sharing and persistence. > > 2. No particular scheduler has been selected. The current plan in > > Coyotos is to continue with the Mercer/Tokuda capacity reserve > > scheduler by default. > > Won't the scheduler be selectable? At least at the compiling stage. Yes, but this avoids the question, which is: what will the choice(s) be? shap _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
