On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 11:08 +0200, Pierre THIERRY wrote: > > It is better and faster to just update the payload if what you are > > trying to accomplish is to block the second and subsequent replies. > > But I'm not sure it is what I want. In fact, now I'm pretty sure it's > not. To just block subsequent replies is needed upon completion, but for > cancellation forwarding you need a bit more.
Can you say why you believe this? I think there is a hidden assumption here that may be mistaken. >From the perspective of the invoker, there is no difference in behavior between invoking a Null cap and invoking a cap with a non-matching payload. shap _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
