Scribit Jonathan S. Shapiro dies 27/04/2006 hora 05:18: > > But I'm not sure it is what I want. In fact, now I'm pretty sure > > it's not. To just block subsequent replies is needed upon > > completion, but for cancellation forwarding you need a bit more. > Can you say why you believe this? I think there is a hidden assumption > here that may be mistaken.
My assumption, confirmed by what you say just below, is that the check you're suggesting needs to invoke the capability to the FCRB, thus needing to page it in, and the owner of the FCRB then to process the incoming activation. > From the perspective of the invoker, there is no difference in > behavior between invoking a Null cap and invoking a cap with a > non-matching payload. But section 6.1 describes the invocation of a FCRB sender's capability, and it seems to always lead to a delivery. So how do you intend the watchdog to perform the test? And how the client is supposed to discriminate between the test and the actual answer? Doubtfully, Nowhere man -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
