Scribit Bas Wijnen dies 29/04/2006 hora 11:21: > What I mean by "doing something wrong", is to do something morally > objectionable, such as breaking the law (assuming that you don't > consider that particular law itself immoral).
Wrong is not morally reprehensible, which in turn is not morally objectionable. I should not actively help to make something I personnally consider morally objectionable, but I should know that it is my personal judgement and not something absolute. This is very different from, for example, something that would be illegal. Which I agree we should prevent the user to be able to do it, if it won't prevent legal uses. > > Design principles are not inflexible laws, merely strong guidelines. > They are inflexible laws. That should be made clear (and quite a few among us could confirm that it is the way they see design principles). And then design principles should be written. We cannot have implicit inflexible laws. Juridically, Nowhere man -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
