l4-hurd  

Messages by Date

• 2006/05/03 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/03 Clarification (was: Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/03 Part 1: Ownership and Contracts Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/03 Re: No need for CC, please Thomas Schwinge
• 2006/05/03 Re: Theft of Secrets (was: Re: Design principles and ethics) Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/03 Re: Design principles and ethics Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/03 Re: How to add constructor to the Hurd? Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/02 Re: L4-hurd Digest, Vol 40, Issue 24 C Y
• 2006/05/02 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement olafBuddenhagen
• 2006/05/02 Theft of Secrets (was: Re: Design principles and ethics) olafBuddenhagen
• 2006/05/02 Re: How to add constructor to the Hurd? olafBuddenhagen
• 2006/05/02 Re: No need for CC, please olafBuddenhagen
• 2006/05/02 RE: Design principles and ethics Christopher Nelson
• 2006/05/02 Re: L4-hurd Digest, Vol 40, Issue 23 Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/02 Re: Design principles and ethics Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/02 Re: L4-hurd Digest, Vol 40, Issue 23 C Y
• 2006/05/02 RE: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Christopher Nelson
• 2006/05/02 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Tom Bachmann
• 2006/05/02 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/02 RE: Design principles and ethics Christopher Nelson
• 2006/05/02 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement olafBuddenhagen
• 2006/05/02 Re: On the Requirements of Leadership olafBuddenhagen
• 2006/05/02 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement olafBuddenhagen
• 2006/05/02 Re: No need for CC, please olafBuddenhagen
• 2006/05/02 GNU philosophy and compromises (was: Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement) olafBuddenhagen
• 2006/05/02 Re: Design principles and ethics olafBuddenhagen
• 2006/05/02 Re: machine owner (was: Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement) olafBuddenhagen
• 2006/05/02 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Jeremy Shaw
• 2006/05/02 RE: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Christopher Nelson
• 2006/05/02 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/02 RE: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Christopher Nelson
• 2006/05/02 Re: Playing catch-up, and other grievances Tom Bachmann
• 2006/05/02 Re: Playing catch-up, and other grievances Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/02 Re: Playing catch-up, and other grievances Tom Bachmann
• 2006/05/02 Re: No need for CC, please Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/02 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/02 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/02 Re: No need for CC, please Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/02 Re: No need for CC, please Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/02 Re: No need for CC, please Marco Gerards
• 2006/05/02 Playing catch-up, and other grievances Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/02 Re: No need for CC, please Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/02 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/02 Re: On the Requirements of Leadership Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/02 Re: How to add constructor to the Hurd? Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/02 Re: No need for CC, please Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/02 RE: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Christopher Nelson
• 2006/05/02 RE: Use Cases for Encapsulation and Identification Christopher Nelson
• 2006/05/02 Re: Directories traversal Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/02 On the Requirements of Leadership Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/02 Re: Directories traversal Tom Bachmann
• 2006/05/02 Re: Directories traversal Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/02 Re: No need for CC, please Thomas Schwinge
• 2006/05/02 Re: Design principles and ethics Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/02 Re: How to add constructor to the Hurd? Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/02 Re: How to add constructor to the Hurd? Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/02 Re: Design principles and ethics Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/02 Re: Design principles and ethics Tom Bachmann
• 2006/05/02 Re: No need for CC, please Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/02 Re: Design principles and ethics Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/02 Re: How to add constructor to the Hurd? Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/02 Re: No need for CC, please Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/02 Re: How to add constructor to the Hurd? Tom Bachmann
• 2006/05/02 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/02 Re: Directories traversal Ludovic Courtès
• 2006/05/02 Re: No need for CC, please Jeroen Dekkers
• 2006/05/02 Re: Design principles and ethics Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/02 Re: No need for CC, please Marco Gerards
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: How to add constructor to the Hurd? Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/01 Re: How to add constructor to the Hurd? Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/01 Re: Design principles and ethics Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/01 How to add constructor to the Hurd? Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/01 Re: Design principles and ethics Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/01 Re: Design principles and ethics Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/01 RE: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Christopher Nelson
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/01 RE: Design principles and ethics Christopher Nelson
• 2006/05/01 Re: Design principles and ethics Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/01 RE: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Christopher Nelson
• 2006/05/01 Re: Design principles and ethics Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/01 RE: Design principles and ethics Christopher Nelson
• 2006/05/01 RE: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Christopher Nelson
• 2006/05/01 No need for CC, please Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/01 Re: Design principles and ethics Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/01 Re: machine owner (was: Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement) Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/01 Re: Use Cases for Encapsulation and Identification Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/01 Re: Use Cases for Encapsulation and Identification Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/01 Re: Design principles and ethics (was Re: Execute without read(was [...])) Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/01 Re: Design principles and ethics Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/01 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Michal Suchanek
• 2006/05/01 Off the air Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: Use Cases for Encapsulation and Identification Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Michal Suchanek
• 2006/05/01 Re: Use Cases for Encapsulation and Identification Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: Use Cases for Encapsulation and Identification Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/01 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement olafBuddenhagen
• 2006/05/01 machine owner (was: Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement) olafBuddenhagen
• 2006/05/01 Re: The Indecency of Zealots Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/01 RE: Design principles and ethics (was Re: Execute without read(was [...])) Christopher Nelson
• 2006/05/01 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Use Cases for Encapsulation and Identification Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/01 Re: The Indecency of Zealots Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: Constructor v. Trivial Confinment Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: Constructor v. Trivial Confinment Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/01 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: Constructor v. Trivial Confinment Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 login (was: Re: Design principles and ethics) olafBuddenhagen
• 2006/05/01 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/01 Re: Constructor v. Trivial Confinment Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/01 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Lluis
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Constructor v. Trivial Confinment Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: How to add confinement to the Hurd? Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/01 Re: How to add confinement to the Hurd? Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/01 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/01 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/01 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/01 Re: Design principles and ethics Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: The Indecency of Zealots Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/01 Re: Design principles and ethics Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Tom Bachmann
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/05/01 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Lluis
• 2006/05/01 Re: How to add confinement to the Hurd? Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 The Indecency of Zealots Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: How to add confinement to the Hurd? Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/01 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Lluis
• 2006/05/01 Re: How to add confinement to the Hurd? Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/05/01 Re: Design principles and ethics Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: Physical access without ultimate power? (was Re: Design principles and ethics (was [...]))) Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/05/01 Re: Design principles and ethics Bas Wijnen
• 2006/05/01 Re: Physical access without ultimate power? (was Re: Design principles and ethics (was [...]))) Bas Wijnen
• 2006/04/30 Re: Design principles and ethics Bas Wijnen
• 2006/04/30 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/04/30 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/04/30 Synopsis of confinement discussion Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/04/30 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/04/30 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/04/30 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/04/30 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/04/30 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/04/30 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/04/30 Re: How to add confinement to the Hurd? Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/04/30 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/04/30 Re: How to add confinement to the Hurd? Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/04/30 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/04/30 Re: How to add confinement to the Hurd? Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/04/30 Re: Physical access without ultimate power? (was Re: Design principles and ethics (was [...]))) Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/04/30 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/04/30 Re: How to add confinement to the Hurd? Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/04/30 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/04/30 Re: Physical access without ultimate power? (was Re: Design principles and ethics (was [...]))) Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/04/30 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/04/30 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/04/30 Re: How to add confinement to the Hurd? Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/04/30 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/04/30 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/04/30 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/04/30 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/04/30 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/04/30 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/04/30 Re: How to add confinement to the Hurd? Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/04/30 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/04/30 Re: How to add confinement to the Hurd? Jonathan S. Shapiro
• 2006/04/30 Re: bit-split, or: the schizophrenia of trusted computing Marcus Brinkmann
• 2006/04/30 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Pierre THIERRY
• 2006/04/30 Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement Jonathan S. Shapiro

• Earlier messages
• Later messages