On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 05:43 +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > At Sun, 30 Apr 2006 23:13:49 -0400,
> You can run your own meta-constructor, constructor and space bank, and > have users negotiate on them and use them for their own purpose. While I am not still chasing the banning issue, this definitely constitutes a de facto architectural ban. Yes, I can do this, but it simply isn't very useful. > If this is sufficient for you, then you have just disproved your claim > that the system can not be retrofitted to support this. It is absolutely not sufficient for me. > > I do not see how to prevent this without disabling IPC altogether. What > > am I missing here? > > I have never made any attempt to prevent it. Are you still chasing > the "banning" stuff? No. I had simply failed to understand just how completely awful the proposed design was. shap _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
