On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 08:36 +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > At Mon, 01 May 2006 01:25:37 -0400, > "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I actually find this very curious. RMS has been willing to let the world > > evolve into understanding over time, and this has been greatly > > beneficial. Marcus is trying to take a "giant leap." I don't think it is > > going to work, but it is certainly interesting. > > This is really strange. No operating system in wide use supports the > confinement property as you advocate it. Not using confinement in the > system design really is the conservative choice. In another mail you > said that my proposal was radical. I wish I would have the honor of > finding a radical new operating system design, but that is of course > not the case.
Omitting confinement is not the radical part. The radical part is omitting encapsulation -- which is what I clearly said if you had bothered to read. shap _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
