Scribit Bas Wijnen dies 01/05/2006 hora 11:30: > In order to guarantee confinement (and encapsulation, as you define it below), > A. The instantiator must know that there is no unauthorized outward > communication. Unauthorized by the instantiator, that is. > B. The parent must know that information cannot be extracted from the program > without the parent's consent. > > Now the question is: are these requirements fulfilled for the case of "trivial > confinement". Indeed they are, because in that case the parent and the > instantiator are the same process, which leads to an implicit trust of each > other.
But trivial confinement adds an additional, perhaps unwanted, requirement: C. The child cannot have any capability that the parent couldn't gain access to. Am I wrong? Additionaly, Nowhere man -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
