-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> Scribit Tom Bachmann dies 15/05/2006 hora 20:15:
>>>> Jonathan wants it, _every_ subprocess receives such an opaque
>>>> donation of its storage.
>>> Were did you read that. That's not how I understood it.
>> This is the property Jonathan calls encapsulation (and that is default
>> in his design, IIUC).
>
> I'm not entirely sure that every use of the constructor needs
> encapsulation.
It does not.
"It would be easy and harmless to add a bit that would permit
initial inspection, but I will describe important use cases
(later) that are impossible if inspection is mandatory."
-- Jonathan
(http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/l4-hurd/2006-05/msg00056.html)
Instead, all of the functions of the constructor shown in the mail can
be taken for themselves, but some 'features' you can only get with
multiple of these functions.
- --
- -ness-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEaNt2vD/ijq9JWhsRAuc8AJ4qRshMfbgr2jQK4C4lOJhZm+kzfQCfVKhg
R9iRK/MqODkC4YBD4Jl1+NA=
=RVZa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
L4-hurd mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
