Reply to Greg Palast
George Galloway


Until a couple of days ago I hadn't heard of Greg 
Palast in years, the man who claims to have been 
pursuing me with questions for two months. He has 
never phoned, written, emailed or made any other 
contact with me, which is curiously reminiscent 
of the behavior of the US Senate committee. 
Having now forced myself to look at his 
pernicious writing, it seems like the deranged 
ramblings you might expect to find pushed out 
from under the door of a locked ward. He claims 
to be a journalist. He clearly doesn't get much 
work.

Palast conflates meetings, truths and 
half-truths, statements taken out of context to 
produce a toxic smear which would be actionable 
in the country he claims to work in, my country. 
How many times do I have to respond to the 
ravings of guttersnipes? I met Saddam twice, the 
same number of times as Donald Rumsfeld. The 
difference is that I wasn't trying to sell him 
weapons and guidance systems. The first, and 
infamous time, my words were taken out of 
context. The second, where Saddam revealed his 
favorite confectionery, I was trying to persuade 
him to let the weapons' inspectors back in. A 
vain mission, of course, as the US and UK had 
already decided to illegally go to war whatever 
he did.

The Mariam Appeal, which Palast drags in to 
allege I benefited financially from its work, was 
not a charity. It was a political campaign. Its 
primary function was not to provide medicines for 
Iraqi children, although we did, but to highlight 
the political conditions which were killing them. 
Sanctions!  The largest donor was the ruler of 
the UAE (who gave approximately £500,000), 
followed by Fawaz Zureikat's £375,000, and then 
the now king of Saudi Arabia (a regime I loath) 
with £150,000. The donations of these three 
represented 99% of the campaign's total income. 
These donors were prominently identified at the 
time, there was no attempt to hide them, as this 
palooka claims. None of them have complained the 
money was ill-spent. Palast might take the view 
that finance should not be taken from such 
sources. Sorry, but needs must.

Among the works undertaken by the appeal was a 
daily newsletter on sanctions, a 
sanctions-busting flight into Baghdad, the Big 
Ben to Baghdad trip in a red London bus, 
countless meetings and conferences, posters and 
flyers, the projection of an anti-war slogan on 
the House of Commons, the first time that had 
ever been done -- and the facilitating of trips 
to Iraq by dozens of journalists, many of whom 
sat in on my meetings with Tariq Aziz. And 
virtually all of whom were conducted around 
Baghdad by Fawaz Zureikat, openly introduced as 
the Mariam Appeal's chairman, as well as a 
businessman trading with Iraq. We brought Mariam 
Hamza to Britain for treatment -- immodestly, but 
factually, I claim that we saved her life -- 
where she remained for half a year, sent back 
cured. I could go on and on but my enemies would 
surely claim I was blowing my own trumpet.

But what I will not tolerate -- and will sue in 
any territory where it is possible to do so -- is 
the lie that I personally benefited financially 
from the campaign. The Charity Commission inquiry 
Palast refers to was occasioned by a referral 
from Tony Blair's Attorney General. The 
commission are in possession of every receipt of 
funds and every cheque issues or bank transfer 
ever made. They satisfied that there was no 
malfeasance and closed the case without further 
action, no doubt to the disappointment of Mr 
Blair's Attorney General. Charities in Britain 
cannot campaign politically, which was the prime 
function of the appeal and in their judgment the 
commission said that the operation should have 
been split in two, one arm of which, the one 
which provided the physical aid, should have 
registered as a charity. Well, sorry, but that's 
poppycock.

The stumblebum then drags in Hitchens -- perhaps 
it's two bums finding mutual support -- a man I 
recently debated in New York. For what seems like 
the ten-thousandth time let me try to finally 
nail the canard that I benefited through the 
oil-for-food programme, an allegation at the time 
of writing which has netted me at least $4 
million in libel damages and costs. Of course, 
when I talked with Tariq Aziz, I talked about the 
programme, but only in respect of the effects it 
was having on Iraq. I did not request or receive 
oil vouchers. I did not benefit financially. Not 
by one thin dime! I said voluntarily and on pain 
of prosecution under oath to the US Senate 
committee -- another body which doesn't let the 
facts get in the way of a good smear -- and I say 
it again. If I had been guilty of what Palast 
alleges I'd be sitting not in the House of 
Commons but a prison cell! Let that be an end to 
it because I'm sure the public is even more tired 
and bemused than I am.

Crawl back under your rock, Mr Palast!

George Galloway MP


                
---------------------------------
Yahoo! for Good
 Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Help Sudanese refugees rebuild their lives through GlobalGiving.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/V8WM1C/EbOLAA/E2hLAA/7gSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to