Internet Doomsday Creeps Closer
Big government pushes for total taxation and restriction on the last great 
outpost of free speech
            
reddit_url='http://infowars.net/articles/may2007/050607Internet.htm'    
reddit_title='Internet Doomsday Creeps Closer'        
       digg_title = 'Internet Doomsday Creeps Closer'; digg_bodytext = ' Recent 
proposals in the U.S. Congress are taking a huge swipe at freedom in America 
once again by aiming to impose multiple different forms of crippling taxation 
and restriction on providers, traders and general users of the internet.' ; 
digg_topic = 'politics';       
        Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Monday, June 4, 2007                                              Email Print 
Friendly Page
 Yahoo! MyWeb  Del.icio.us 
   Recent proposals in the U.S. Congress are taking a huge swipe at freedom in 
America once again by aiming to impose multiple different forms of crippling 
taxation and restriction on users of the internet.   State and local 
governments this week resumed a push to lobby Congress for far-reaching changes 
on two different fronts: gaining the ability to impose sales taxes on Net 
shopping, and being able to levy new monthly taxes on DSL and other 
Internet-service connections. One senator is even predicting taxes on e-mail, 
reports CNet.       Several bills were introduced last week that could see all 
manner of new forms of internet taxation become a reality before the end of the 
year.       Sen. Michael Enzi, a Wyoming Republican, introduced a bill (PDF 
link) for mandatory sales tax collection for Internet purchases, meaning that 
if you buy items through online sites like eBay or Amazon.com, you might have 
to start paying additional sales taxes on your purchases.       The
 Libertarian party has warned that the bill represents more big government 
intervention and that while Enzi insists the bill "would not increase taxes," 
the Sales Tax Fairness and Simplification Act would open the door for states to 
charge sales tax on Internet sales. In contrast to his statement, the C-Net 
article states that Enzi warned that other taxes may zoom upward if his 
"mandatory sales tax collection" bill isn't passed.   In a second and separate 
proposal during a House of Representatives hearing last week, politicians 
weighed whether to let a temporary ban on internet access taxes lapse when it 
expires on November 1.       Such a move would leave open the possibility that 
simply using the internet would require a tax to be paid which critics suggest 
could sound a death knell for broadband, DSL and "always on" high speed 
internet.       Rep. Hank Johnson, a Democrat from Georgia compared the move to 
taxing people for simply entering shopping malls or libraries.
 With the U.S. economy already under considerable strain, taking a huge swipe 
at e-commerce, one of its cornerstones, seems like the worst possible thing 
Congress could do.       Furthermore, allowing taxation on internet access 
represents a slippery slope towards opening up the possibilities of taxing all 
kinds of internet based services.       "They might say, 'We have no interest 
in having taxes on e-mail,' but if we allow the prohibition on Internet taxes 
to expire, then you open the door on cities and towns and states to tax e-mail 
or other aspects of Internet access," said Sen. John Sununu, a New Hampshire 
Republican.       An email tax would certainly suit both the government and 
internet providers who would likely get a cut. Last year it was revealed that 
AOL is planning to charge mass-emailers a fee to avoid the ISP's spam filters 
and guarantee that their marketing emails arrive straight in AOL subscribers' 
inboxes. Yahoo! is also endorsing the scheme.       Under
 such a system email considered "uncertified" would risk running through AOL 
and Yahoo!'s discrimination process. And as this potential profit center for 
the two net giants takes off, there's no incentive for either company to 
deliver the "free email" - and every incentive for them to get the world 
conditioned to paying for guaranteed delivery.
   
  A United Nations agency also proposed in 1999 the idea of a 
1-cent-per-100-message tax, indicating that the idea has been floating around 
for almost a decade.                           In recent months, a chorus of 
propaganda intended to demonize the Internet and further lead it down a path of 
strict control has spewed forth from numerous establishment organs:

    
   Time magazine reported last month that researchers funded by the federal 
government want to shut down the internet and start over, citing the fact that 
at the moment there are loopholes in the system whereby users cannot be tracked 
and traced all the time. The projects echo moves we have previously reported on 
to clamp down on internet neutrality and even to designate a new form of the 
internet known as Internet 2.

  
   In a display of bi-partisanship, there have recently been calls for all out 
mandatory ISP snooping on all US citizens by both Democrats and Republicans 
alike. 

  
   Republican Senator John McCain recently tabled a proposal to introduce 
legislation that would fine blogs up to $300,000 for offensive statements, 
photos and videos posted by visitors on comment boards. It is well known that 
McCain has a distaste for his blogosphere critics, causing a definite conflict 
of interest where any proposal to restrict blogs on his part is concerned.

  
     During an appearance with his wife Barbara on Fox News last November, 
George Bush senior slammed Internet bloggers for creating an "adversarial and 
ugly climate."


  
     The White House's own recently de-classified strategy for "winning the war 
on terror" targets Internet conspiracy theories as a recruiting ground for 
terrorists and threatens to "diminish" their influence.


  
     The Pentagon recently announced its effort to infiltrate the Internet and 
propagandize for the war on terror.


  
     In a speech last October, Homeland Security director Michael Chertoff 
identified the web as a "terror training camp," through which "disaffected 
people living in the United States" are developing "radical ideologies and 
potentially violent skills." His solution is "intelligence fusion centers," 
staffed by Homeland Security personnel which will go into operation next year.


  
     The U.S. Government wants to force bloggers and online grassroots 
activists to register and regularly report their activities to Congress. 
Criminal charges including a possible jail term of up to one year could be the 
punishment for non-compliance.


  
     A landmark legal case on behalf of the Recording Industry Association of 
America and other global trade organizations seeks to criminalize all Internet 
file sharing of any kind as copyright infringement, effectively shutting down 
the world wide web - and their argument is supported by the U.S. government.


  
     A landmark legal ruling in Sydney goes further than ever before in setting 
the trap door for the destruction of the Internet as we know it and the end of 
alternative news websites and blogs by creating the precedent that simply 
linking to other websites is breach of copyright and piracy.


  
     The European Union, led by former Stalinist and potential future British 
Prime Minister John Reid, has also vowed to shut down "terrorists" who use the 
Internet to spread propaganda.


  
     The EU data retention bill, passed last year after much controversy and 
with implementation tabled for late 2007, obliges telephone operators and 
internet service providers to store information on who called who and who 
emailed who for at least six months. Under this law, investigators in any EU 
country, and most bizarrely even in the US, can access EU citizens' data on 
phone calls, sms', emails and instant messaging services. 


  
     The EU also recently proposed legislation that would prevent users from 
uploading any form of video without a license.


  
   The US government is also funding research into social networking sites and 
how to gather and store personal data published on them, according to the New 
Scientist magazine. "At the same time, US lawmakers are attempting to force the 
social networking sites themselves to control the amount and kind of 
information that people, particularly children, can put on the sites." 

     ---------------------------------------------
The true story behind government sponsored terror, 7/7, Gladio and 9/11, get 
Terror Storm!
Let us help you reach a huge audience of potential customers. Help support the 
website and take advantage of low advertising rates. Click here for more info. 
------------------------------------------- 
  The development of a new form of internet with new regulations is also 
designed to create an online caste system whereby the old internet hubs would 
be allowed to break down and die, forcing people to use the new taxable, 
censored and regulated world wide web. 
   
  Make no mistake, the internet, one of the greatest outposts of free speech 
ever created is under constant attack by powerful people who cannot operate 
within a society where information flows freely and unhindered. Both American 
and European moves mimic stories we hear every week out of State Controlled 
Communist China, where the internet is strictly regulated and virtually exists 
as its own entity away from the rest of the web.
   
  The Internet is freedom's best friend and the bane of control freaks. Its 
eradication is one of the short term goals of those that seek to centralize 
power and subjugate their populations under a surveillance panopticon prison. 

  http://www.infowars.net/articles/june2007/050607Internet.htm























       
---------------------------------
Luggage? GPS? Comic books? 
Check out fitting  gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to