http://www.bibdaily.com/

Ariz. birthright citizenship bills pulled after businesses voice opposition

"The proposals also drew opposition from the business community. Kevin
Sandler, president of Exhibit One, said he worried about the message
adopting such a law would send. Sandler said his firm, which provides
audiovisual equipment to courts across the nation, had to lay off six
employees after some out-of-state firms boycotted Arizona businesses after
lawmakers adopted SB 1070 last year. That measure gives police more power to
detain illegal immigrants. "We've created a toxic environment," he told
lawmakers. "Businesses don't want to move here." He said companies looking
to relocate pay attention to the political climate in a state. "What we've
really done is create a not-open-for-business environment here." And Glenn
Hamer, president of the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry, told
legislators they should leave the question of citizenship where it belongs:
in Congress." Arizona Daily Star, Feb. 8, 2011.

 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Ariz. citizenship bills run into trouble
Backers of proposals that aim to ultimately deny U.S. citizenship to
children born to illegal immigrants suffered a setback on Monday when the
chairman of the Arizona Senate committee that tackled the bills concluded he
did not have the votes to approve them." AZCapitolTimes, Feb. 7, 2010.
------------------------------

 AZ measures intended to block legal status for immigrants' kids
Birthright-citizenship bills pulled
Birthright-citizenship bills
pulled<http://azstarnet.com/news/local/border/article_e3f477cf-fdb2-5609-afd1-db34e3f9dfd0.html>

Howard Fischer Capitol Media Services
<http://azstarnet.com/search/?l=50&sd=desc&s=start_time&f=html&byline=Howard+Fischer+Capitol+Media+Services>Arizona
Daily Star | Posted: Tuesday, February 8, 2011 12:00 am

PHOENIX - A bid to deny citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants
faltered Monday when proponents could not get the votes of a Senate panel.

After more than three hours of testimony at the Senate Judiciary Committee,
Sen. Ron Gould, R-Lake Havasu City, yanked the two measures. Gould said he
lacked the backing of four other members of the Republican-controlled panel,
which he chairs.

Gould said he will keep trying to secure votes. And Senate President Russell
Pearce, R-Mesa, said, if necessary, he will reassign the proposal to a more
friendly committee.

The failure came despite Gould's allowing John Eastman, a Chapman University
law professor, to argue for more than an hour that there is no legal basis
for the current practice of giving citizenship to all children based on the
location of their birth. Eastman said passing the two measures proposed by
Gould would finally give the nation's high court a chance to squarely
address the scope of the 14th Amendment.

The amendment says that persons born in this country and "subject to the
jurisdiction thereof" are considered U.S. citizens.

Gould and Pearce contend that was never the intent of those who wrote the
measure approved after the Civil War. The intent was solely to clarify that
former slaves and their children were entitled to citizenship despite a
pre-war court decision declaring the contrary, they argue.

One proposal would define Arizona citizenship - and, by extension, U.S.
citizenship - as requiring that at least one parent prove U.S. citizenship
or permanent legal residency. The other would set up a system under which
birth certificates would be marked as to whether they prove citizenship,
with states agreeing to honor each other's notations.

Even before any testimony, Sen. Adam Driggs, R-Phoenix, said the proposal,
based on that idea of Arizona citizenship, raises a host of unanswered
questions.

"I don't understand how you become an Arizona citizen if you move to
Arizona, what the bureaucratic model would be," he said. "Do you then need
to bring your own birth certificate and both of your parents' birth
certificates?"

There were also several children who spoke against the bill, including
12-year-old Heide Portugal who said she was born in this country but her
parents were not and that a measure like this, had it been in effect, would
have denied her citizenship.

The proposals also drew opposition from the business community.

Kevin Sandler, president of Exhibit One, said he worried about the message
adopting such a law would send.

Sandler said his firm, which provides audiovisual equipment to courts across
the nation, had to lay off six employees after some out-of-state firms
boycotted Arizona businesses after lawmakers adopted SB 1070 last year. That
measure gives police more power to detain illegal immigrants.

"We've created a toxic environment," he told lawmakers. "Businesses don't
want to move here."

He said companies looking to relocate pay attention to the political climate
in a state.

"What we've really done is create a not-open-for-business environment here."

And Glenn Hamer, president of the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry,
told legislators they should leave the question of citizenship where it
belongs: in Congress.

Aside from Eastman, all of the testimony was in opposition. Activist
Salvador Reza said the debate over which children get legal recognition is
"not very dissimilar to the debate that happened in South Africa not too
long ago."

"Young kids like this were denied citizenship for whatever reasons," Reza
said.

Jennifer Allen, executive director of the Border Action Network, said
denying citizenship to children born in this country based on a parent's
citizenship would create "a permanent underclass" of people in the state.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to