One file shows that Sami al-Hajj, an Al Jazeera journalist held at
Guantanamo for six years, was detained partly in order to be interrogated
about the news network.

His file states that one of the
reasons<http://wikileaks.ch/gitmo/prisoner/345.html>he was detained
was "to provide information on … the Al Jazeera news
network's training programme, telecommunications equipment, and
newsgathering operations in Chechnya, Kosovo and Afghanistan, including the
network's acquisition of a video of UBL [Osama bin Laden] and a subsequent
interview with UBL".

Al-Hajj was released in 2008 and has since returned to work for Al Jazeera.
*To see video report click on the url-*
**
*http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2011/04/201142561524783918.html*<http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2011/04/201142561524783918.html>

  'Guantanamo files': Dozens held were innocent
Leaked files reveal details of interrogations of "high-risk" detainees, but
suggest many innocents were also rounded up.
 Last Modified: 25 Apr 2011 10:34
 [image: Email Article]
Email<http://english.aljazeera.net/Services/ArticleTools/Send2Friend.aspx?GUID=201142561524783918>
 [image: Print Article]
Print <javascript:void(0)>
 [image: Share article]
Share <http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php>
 [image: Send Feedback]
Send 
Feedback<http://english.aljazeera.net/Services/ArticleTools/SendFeedback.aspx?GUID=201142561524783918>
      *US officials were said to have found no reason recorded for
some detainees' transfer to Guantanamo [Al Jazeera]*

The United States released dozens of so-called "high-risk" detainees from
the Guantanamo Bay prison facility and held more than 150 innocent men for
years, according to new reports about a trove of leaked military documents.

The more than 700 classified military files, part of a massive cache of
secret documents leaked to the whistle-blowing website
WikiLeaks<http://wikileaks.ch/gitmo/>,
were made available to select US and European media outlets and made public
on Sunday.

It was not clear if the media outlets published the documents with the
consent of WikiLeaks - and it was not immediately possible to independently
verify all of the leaked documents.

The files are reported to reveal new information about some of the men held
at the US prison facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, including details of the
more than 700 detainee interrogations and evidence the US had collected
against the "terror" suspects.

The files - called Detainee Assessment Briefs or DABs - describe the
security intelligence value of the detainees and whether they would be a
threat to the US and its allies if released.

*'High-risk' threat*

To date, 604 inmates have been transferred out of Guantanamo while 172
remain detained.

Thousands of pages of the files are reported to reveal that most of the
prisoners who remain at Guantanamo - 130 of them - have been rated as posing
a "high-risk'" threat to the US if they are freed without rehabilitation or
supervision.

Even more of the George W Bush-era "war on terror" suspects were branded
"high-risk" before being released or handed to other governments, *The New
York Times <http://www.nytimes.com/guantanamo-files/>*, one of the
newspapers that received the documents, reported.

The documents show some inmates were described as more dangerous than
previously known to the public and could complicate efforts by the US to
transfer detainees out of the prison.

However, the documents also show that dozens of detainees were found to be
innocent, after being held for lengthy periods.

At least 150 people were innocent Afghans or Pakistanis, including drivers,
farmers and chefs, who were rounded up as part of frantic intelligence
gathering, and then detained for years.

In several cases, senior US commanders were said to have concluded that
there is "no reason recorded for transfer".

*Al Jazeera file*

The documents also show instances in which authorities were concerned less
with containing dangerous suspects than on extracting intelligence.

Sami al-Hajj was working as an Al Jazeera cameraman when he was arrested in
2001 and sent to Guantanamo

One file shows that Sami al-Hajj, an Al Jazeera journalist held at
Guantanamo for six years, was detained partly in order to be interrogated
about the news network.

His file states that one of the
reasons<http://wikileaks.ch/gitmo/prisoner/345.html>he was detained
was "to provide information on … the Al Jazeera news
network's training programme, telecommunications equipment, and
newsgathering operations in Chechnya, Kosovo and Afghanistan, including the
network's acquisition of a video of UBL [Osama bin Laden] and a subsequent
interview with UBL".

Al-Hajj was released in 2008 and has since returned to work for Al Jazeera.

Hundreds of other detainees reportedly underwent aggressive interrogation
techniques before it was determined that they were low-level fighters.

*Legal limbo*

The administration of US president Barack Obama criticised the publication
of the files as "unfortunate", calling them "sensitive information".

"It is unfortunate that several news organisations have made the decision to
publish numerous documents obtained illegally by WikiLeaks concerning the
Guantanamo detention facility,'' ambassador Daniel Fried, the Obama
administration's special envoy on detainee issues, and Pentagon press
secretary Geoff Morrell, said in a joint statement.

But they added that the documents were out of date, and that the
administration's Guantanamo review panel, established in January 2009, had
made its own assessments.

"The assessments of the Guantanamo Review Task Force have not been
compromised to WikiLeaks. Thus, any given DAB (Detainee Assessment Briefs)
illegally obtained and released by WikiLeaks may or may not represent the
current view of a given detainee."
Obama pledged two years ago to close the prison, but it remains in legal
limbo.
-------------------------------------

http://wikileaks.ch/gitmo/

 <http://wikileaks.ch/gitmo/>
The Guantanamo Files

On Sunday April 24, 2011 WikiLeaks began publishing 779 secret files from
the notorious Guantanamo Bay prison camp. The details for every detainee
will be released daily over the coming month.
WikiLeaks Reveals Secret Files on All Guantánamo Prisoners
- WikiLeaks Reveals Secret Files on All Guantánamo
Prisoners<http://wikileaks.ch/gitmo/index.html>(english)
- Wikileakes révèle les dossiers secrets de tous les prisonniers de
Guantánamo<http://wikileaks.ch/gitmo/Wikileaks_revele_les_dossiers_secrets_de_tous_les_prisonniers_de_Guantanamo.html>(français)
- Wikileaks saca a luz expedientes secretos de todos los prisioneros en
Guantánamo<http://wikileaks.ch/gitmo/Wikileaks_saca_a_luz_expedientes_secretos_de_todos_los_prisioneros_en_Guantanamo.html>(español)
- Викиликс раскрывает секретные дела всех узников
Гуантанамо<http://wikileaks.ch/gitmo/Викиликс_раскрывает_секретные_дела_всех_узников_Гуантанамо.html>(Русский)
- Wikileaks avslöjar hemliga dokument om alla fångar i Guantanamo Bay
<http://wikileaks.ch/gitmo/Wikileaks_avslöjar_hemliga_dokument_om_alla_fångar_i_Guantanamo_Bay.html>
(Svenska)

In its latest release of classified US documents, WikiLeaks is shining the
light of truth on a notorious icon of the Bush administration's "War on
Terror" -- the prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, which opened on January 11,
2002, and remains open under President Obama, despite his promise to close
the much-criticized facility within a year of taking office.

In thousands of pages of documents dating from 2002 to 2008 and never seen
before by members of the public or the media, the cases of the majority of
the prisoners held at Guantánamo -- 758 out of 779 in total -- are described
in detail in memoranda from JTF-GTMO, the Joint Task Force at Guantánamo
Bay, to US Southern Command in Miami, Florida.

These memoranda, which contain JTF-GTMO's recommendations about whether the
prisoners in question should continue to be held, or should be released
(transferred to their home governments, or to other governments) contain a
wealth of important and previously undisclosed information, including health
assessments, for example, and, in the cases of the majority of the 171
prisoners who are still held, photos (mostly for the first time ever).

They also include information on the first 201 prisoners released from the
prison, between 2002 and 2004, which, unlike information on the rest of the
prisoners (summaries of evidence and tribunal transcripts, released as the
result of a lawsuit filed by media groups in 2006), has never been made
public before. Most of these documents reveal accounts of incompetence
familiar to those who have studied Guantánamo closely, with innocent men
detained by mistake (or because the US was offering substantial bounties to
its allies for al-Qaeda or Taliban suspects), and numerous insignificant
Taliban conscripts from Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Beyond these previously unknown cases, the documents also reveal stories of
the 397 other prisoners released from September 2004 to the present day, and
of the seven men who have died at the prison.

The memos are signed by the commander of Guantánamo at the time, and
describe whether the prisoners in question are regarded as low, medium or
high risk. Although they were obviously not conclusive in and of themselves,
as final decisions about the disposition of prisoners were taken at a higher
level, they represent not only the opinions of JTF-GTMO, but also the
Criminal Investigation Task Force, created by the Department of Defense to
conduct interrogations in the "War on Terror," and the BSCTs, the behavioral
science teams consisting of psychologists who had a major say in the
"exploitation" of prisoners in interrogation.

Crucially, the files also contain detailed explanations of the supposed
intelligence used to justify the prisoners' detention. For many readers,
these will be the most fascinating sections of the documents, as they seem
to offer an extraordinary insight into the workings of US intelligence, but
although many of the documents appear to promise proof of prisoners'
association with al-Qaeda or other terrorist organizations, extreme caution
is required.

The documents draw on the testimony of witnesses -- in most cases, the
prisoners' fellow prisoners -- whose words are unreliable, either because
they were subjected to torture or other forms of coercion (sometimes not in
Guantánamo, but in secret prisons run by the CIA), or because they provided
false statements to secure better treatment in Guantánamo.

Regular appearances throughout these documents by witnesses whose words
should be regarded as untrustworthy include the following "high-value
detainees" or "ghost prisoners". Please note that "ISN" and the numbers in
brackets following the prisoners' names refer to the short "Internment
Serial Numbers" by which the prisoners are or were identified in US custody:


Abu Zubaydah (ISN 10016), the supposed "high-value detainee" seized in
Pakistan in March 2002, who spent four and a half years in secret CIA
prisons, including facilities in Thailand and Poland. Subjected to
waterboarding, a form of controlled drowning, on 83 occasions in CIA custody
August 2002, Abu Zubaydah was moved to Guantánamo with 13 other "high-value
detainees" in September 2006.

Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi (ISN 212), the emir of a military training camp for
which Abu Zubaydah was the gatekeeper, who, despite having his camp closed
by the Taliban in 2000, because he refused to allow it to be taken over by
al-Qaeda, is described in these documents as Osama bin Laden's military
commander in Tora Bora. Soon after his capture in December 2001, al-Libi was
rendered by the CIA to Egypt, where, under torture, he falsely confessed
that al-Qaeda operatives had been meeting with Saddam Hussein to discuss
obtaining chemical and biological weapons. Al-Libi recanted this particular
lie, but it was nevertheless used by the Bush administration to justify the
invasion of Iraq in March 2003. Al-Libi was never sent to Guantánamo,
although at some point, probably in 2006, the CIA sent him back to Libya,
where he was imprisoned, and where he died, allegedly by committing suicide,
in May 2009.

Sharqawi Abdu Ali al-Hajj (ISN 1457), a Yemeni, also known as Riyadh the
Facilitator, who was seized in a house raid in Pakistan in February 2002,
and is described as "an al-Qaeda facilitator." After his capture, he was
transferred to a torture prison in Jordan run on behalf of the CIA, where he
was held for nearly two years, and was then held for six months in US
facilities in Afghanistan. He was flown to Guantánamo in September 2004.

Sanad Yislam al-Kazimi (ISN 1453), a Yemeni, who was seized in the UAE in
January 2003, and then held in three secret prisons, including the "Dark
Prison" near Kabul and a secret facility within the US prison at Bagram
airbase. In February 2010, in the District Court in Washington D.C., Judge
Henry H. Kennedy Jr. granted the habeas corpus petition of a Yemeni
prisoner, Uthman Abdul Rahim Mohammed Uthman, largely because he refused to
accept testimony produced by either Sharqawi al-Hajj or Sanad al-Kazimi. As
he stated, "The Court will not rely on the statements of Hajj or Kazimi
because there is unrebutted evidence in the record that, at the time of the
interrogations at which they made the statements, both men had recently been
tortured."

Others include Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani (ISN 10012) and Walid bin Attash (ISN
10014), two more of the "high-value detainees" transferred into Guantánamo
in September 2006, after being held in secret CIA prisons.

*Other unreliable witnesses, held at Guantánamo throughout their detention,
include:*

Yasim Basardah (ISN 252), a Yemeni known as a notorious liar. As the
Washington Post reported in February 2009, he was given preferential
treatment in Guantánamo after becoming what some officials regarded as a
significant informant, although there were many reasons to be doubtful. As
the Post noted, "military officials ... expressed reservations about the
credibility of their star witness since 2004," and in 2006, in an article
for the National Journal, Corine Hegland described how, after a Combatant
Status Review Tribunal at which a prisoner had taken exception to
information provided by Basardah, placing him at a training camp before he
had even arrived in Afghanistan, his personal representative (a military
official assigned instead of a lawyer) investigated Basardah's file, and
found that he had made similar claims against 60 other prisoners. In January
2009, in the District Court in Washington D.C., Judge Richard Leon (an
appointee of George W. Bush) excluded Basardah's statements while granting
the habeas corpus petition of Mohammed El-Gharani, a Chadian national who
was just 14 years old when he was seized in a raid on a mosque in Pakistan.
Judge Leon noted that the government had "specifically cautioned against
relying on his statements without independent corroboration," and in other
habeas cases that followed, other judges relied on this precedent,
discrediting the "star witness" still further.

Mohammed al-Qahtani (ISN 063), a Saudi regarded as the planned 20th hijacker
for the 9/11 attacks, was subjected to a specific torture program at
Guantánamo, approved by defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld. This consisted of
20-hour interrogations every day, over a period of several months, and
various other "enhanced interrogation techniques," which severely endangered
his health. Variations of these techniques then migrated to other prisoners
in Guantánamo (and to Abu Ghraib), and in January 2009, just before George
W. Bush left office, Susan Crawford, a retired judge and a close friend of
Dick Cheney and David Addington, who was appointed to oversee the military
commissions at Guantánamo as the convening authority, told Bob Woodward that
she had refused to press charges against al-Qahtani, because, as she said,
"We tortured Qahtani. His treatment met the legal definition of torture." As
a result, his numerous statements about other prisoners must be regarded as
worthless.

Abd al-Hakim Bukhari (ISN 493), a Saudi imprisoned by al-Qaeda as a spy, who
was liberated by US forces from a Taliban jail before being sent,
inexplicably, to Guantánamo (along with four other men liberated from the
jail) is regarded in the files as a member of al-Qaeda, and a trustworthy
witness.

Abd al-Rahim Janko (ISN 489), a Syrian Kurd, tortured by al-Qaeda as a spy
and then imprisoned by the Taliban along with Abd al-Hakim Bukhari, above,
is also used as a witness, even though he was mentally unstable. As his
assessment in June 2008 stated, "Detainee is on a list of high-risk
detainees from a health perspective ... He has several chronic medical
problems. He has a psychiatric history of substance abuse, depression,
borderline personality disorder, and prior suicide attempt for which he is
followed by behavioral health for treatment."

These are just some of the most obvious cases, but alert readers will notice
that they are cited repeatedly in what purports to be the government's
evidence, and it should, as a result, be difficult not to conclude that the
entire edifice constructed by the government is fundamentally unsound, and
that what the Guantánamo Files reveal, primarily, is that only a few dozen
prisoners are genuinely accused of involvement in terrorism.

The rest, these documents reveal on close inspection, were either innocent
men and boys, seized by mistake, or Taliban foot soldiers, unconnected to
terrorism. Moreover, many of these prisoners were actually sold to US
forces, who were offering bounty payments for al-Qaeda and Taliban suspects,
by their Afghan and Pakistani allies -- a policy that led ex-President
Musharraf to state, in his 2006 memoir, In the Line of Fire, that, in return
for handing over 369 terror suspects to the US, the Pakistani government
“earned bounty payments totalling millions of dollars.”

Uncomfortable facts like these are not revealed in the deliberations of the
Joint Task Force, but they are crucial to understanding why what can appear
to be a collection of documents confirming the government's scaremongering
rhetoric about Guantánamo -- the same rhetoric that has paralyzed President
Obama, and revived the politics of fear in Congress -- is actually the
opposite: the anatomy of a colossal crime perpetrated by the US government
on 779 prisoners who, for the most part, are not and never have been the
terrorists the government would like us to believe they are.

(Andy Worthington)
How to Read WikiLeaks' Guantánamo Files

The nearly 800 documents in WikiLeaks' latest release of classified US
documents are memoranda from Joint Task Force Guantánamo (JTF-GTMO), the
combined force in charge of the US "War on Terror" prison at Guantánamo Bay,
Cuba, to US Southern Command, in Miami, Florida, regarding the disposition
of the prisoners.

Written between 2002 and 2008, the memoranda were all marked as "secret,"
and their subject was whether to continue holding a prisoner, or whether to
recommend his release (described as his "transfer" -- to the custody of his
own government, or that of some other government). They were obviously not
conclusive in and of themselves, as final decisions about the disposition of
prisoners were taken at a higher level, but they are very significant, as
they represent not only the opinions of JTF-GTMO, but also the Criminal
Investigation Task Force, created by the Department of Defense to conduct
interrogations in the "War on Terror," and the BSCTs, the behavioral science
teams consisting of psychologists who had a major say in the "exploitation"
of prisoners in interrogation.

Under the heading, "JTF-GTMO Detainee Assessment," the memos generally
contain nine sections, describing the prisoners as follows, although the
earlier examples, especially those dealing with prisoners released -- or
recommended for release -- between 2002 and 2004, may have less detailed
analyses than the following:

1. Personal information

Each prisoner is identified by name, by aliases, which the US claims to have
identified, by place and date of birth, by citizenship, and by Internment
Serial Number (ISN). These long lists of numbers and letters -- e.g.
US9YM-000027DP -- are used to identify the prisoners in Guantánamo, helping
to dehumanize them, as intended, by doing away with their names. The most
significant section is the number towards the end, which is generally
shortened, so that the example above would be known as ISN 027. In the
files, the prisoners are identified by nationality, with 47 countries in
total listed alphabetically, from "az" for Afghanistan to "ym" for Yemen.
2. Health

This section describes whether or not the prisoner in question has mental
health issues and/or physical health issues. Many are judged to be in good
health, but there are some shocking examples of prisoners with severe mental
and/or physical problems.
3. JTF-GTMO Assessment


a. Under "Recommendation," the Task Force explains whether a prisoner should
continue to be held, or should be released.
b. Under "Executive Summary," the Task Force briefly explains its reasoning,
and, in more recent cases, also explains whether the prisoner is a low,
medium or high risk as a threat to the US and its allies and as a threat in
detention (i.e. based on their behavior in Guantánamo), and also whether
they are regarded as of low, medium or high intelligence value.
c. Under "Summary of Changes," the Task Force explains whether there has
been any change in the information provided since the last appraisal
(generally, the prisoners are appraised on an annual basis).
4. Detainee's Account of Events

Based on the prisoners' own testimony, this section puts together an account
of their history, and how they came to be seized, in Afghanistan, Pakistan
or elsewhere, based on their own words.
5. Capture Information

This section explains how and where the prisoners were seized, and is
followed by a description of their possessions at the time of capture, the
date of their transfer to Guantánamo, and, spuriously, "Reasons for Transfer
to JTF-GTMO," which lists alleged reasons for the prisoners' transfer, such
as knowledge of certain topics for exploitation through interrogation. The
reason that this is unconvincing is because, as former interrogator Chris
Mackey (a pseudonym) explained in his book The Interrogators, the US high
command, based in Camp Doha, Kuwait, stipulated that every prisoner who
ended up in US custody had to be transferred to Guantánamo -- and that there
were no exceptions; in other words, the "Reasons for transfer" were grafted
on afterwards, as an attempt to justify the largely random rounding-up of
prisoners.
6. Evaluation of Detainee's Account

In this section, the Task Force analyzes whether or not they find the
prisoners' accounts convincing.
7. Detainee Threat

This section is the most significant from the point of view of the supposed
intelligence used to justify the detention of prisoners. After "Assessment,"
which reiterates the conclusion at 3b, the main section, "Reasons for
Continued Detention," may, at first glance, look convincing, but it must be
stressed that, for the most part, it consists of little more than unreliable
statements made by the prisoners' fellow prisoners -- either in Guantánamo,
or in secret prisons run by the CIA, where torture and other forms of
coercion were widespread, or through more subtle means in Guantánamo, where
compliant prisoners who were prepared to make statements about their fellow
prisoners were rewarded with better treatment. Some examples are available
on the homepage for the release of these documents:
http://wikileaks.ch/gitmo/

With this in mind, it should be noted that there are good reasons why Obama
administration officials, in the interagency Guantánamo Review Task Force
established by the President to review the cases of the 241 prisoners still
held in Guantánamo when he took office, concluded that only 36 could be
prosecuted.

The final part of this section, "Detainee’s Conduct," analyzes in detail how
the prisoners have behaved during their imprisonment, with exact figures
cited for examples of "Disciplinary Infraction."
8. Detainee Intelligence Value Assessment

After reiterating the intelligence assessment at 3b and recapping on the
prisoners' alleged status, this section primarily assesses which areas of
intelligence remain to be "exploited," according to the Task Force.
9. EC Status

The final section notes whether or not the prisoner in question is still
regarded as an "enemy combatant," based on the findings of the Combatant
Status Review Tribunals, held in 2004-05 to ascertain whether, on capture,
the prisoners had been correctly labeled as "enemy combatants." Out of 558
cases, just 38 prisoners were assessed as being "no longer enemy
combatants," and in some cases, when the result went in the prisoners'
favor, the military convened new panels until it got the desired result.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to