http://www.foxandhoundsdaily.com/2013/06/top-two-elections-and-their-effects-on-the-smaller-parties/

Top Two Elections and their Effects on the Smaller Parties

By Michael Feinstein, Spokesperson, Green Party of California; Kevin  
Takenaga, Chair, Libertarian Party of California and Kevin Akin,  
Chair, Peace & Freedom Party
Monday, June 10th, 2013

In view of the devastating effect the Top Two system is having on  
California’s smaller parties, the following joint statement  from the  
Green, Libertarian and Peace & Freedom Parties was sent to all 120  
members of the California state legislature.
• Top Two makes it much harder and more expensive for candidates of  
small parties to qualify for the primary election ballot, thereby  
reducing their number to a record low.
In 2012, the number candidates from the smaller parties running for  
Congress declined 68% from 2008 (the last presidential year before Top  
Two) and for state legislature the number declined 72%, resulting in  
the fewest number of candidates on the primary election ballot from  
any alternative party since 1966, when only the established Democratic  
and Republican parties were on the ballot.
Why? Under Top Two, the number of signatures in lieu of filing fees  
for candidates of the smaller alternative parties have increased  
drastically (for statewide office, from 150 to 10,000.) Smaller  
parties do not have the infrastructure to gather large numbers of  
signatures or pay the filing fees for multiple offices. As a result,  
the candidates either have to pay expensive filing fees or not run at  
all, where previously they could gather enough signatures to avoid  
paying any filing fee. Under Top Two, running for office itself  
becomes more expensive, because now everyone has to reach the entire  
electorate in the primary. As a result, the proportionate increase in  
cost and difficulty is several times greater for candidates of the  
smaller parties, and the need for such funding and organization comes  
much earlier — all of this making it extremely difficult for these  
candidates to run. There is also a major disincentive to go through  
such effort (or pay such fees), when the result is that candidates are  
only on the ballot for less than three months.
• The Top Two makes it almost impossible for candidates of smaller  
parties to appear on the general election ballot.
Experiences in California in 2012 and from Top Two experiments in  
Louisiana and Washington show that if the larger more established  
parties also run candidates in the primary the candidates of the  
smaller alternative parties never appear on the general election  
ballot. Without being on the ballot of the much larger, much more  
significant general election, a party becomes mostly invisible at a  
time when voters are becoming interested in the election campaigns,  
making it extremely hard to attract attention for its issues and  
platform, to raise funds, and to attract and retain members. Having  
only two candidates in the general election also creates false  
majorities that further serve to institutionalize the exclusion of the  
smaller parties from the state’s political debate. Before Proposition  
14, candidates from the smaller parties generally received 5% to 20%  
collectively of the general election vote. In 2012, no Green Party,  
Libertarian Party or American Independent Party candidate qualified  
for the November ballot.
• The Top Two makes it much harder for the smaller parties to remain  
on the ballot.
One of the only two ways a party can retain ballot status is to  
receive 2% of the vote in the general election for a statewide office.  
But the Top Two has de facto taken that possibly away from  
California’s smaller parties. Historically, each of the current ballot  
qualified parties in California (with two exceptions) have  
consistently received over the 2% vote requirement necessary to  
maintain their ballot status, getting from 150,000 to over a half  
million votes in statewide elections every four years.
The other way to stay on the ballot is the 1% voter registration test  
per California Election Code section 5100 (b). Previously, even with  
the benefit of general election ballot access, only the American  
Independent Party and the Green Party have consistently had  
registrations above that 1%.
After 2014, the number of registered voters required for a party to  
maintain its ballot status is likely to rise with statewide population  
increases. At the same time the lack of visibility for the smaller  
parties under the Top Two will make it more difficult for them to  
retain and attract members. As a result, the Greens, Libertarians and  
Peace & Freedom are in danger of falling off the ballot by 2015.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to