William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

Although I'm pained by the difficulty mirroring/forking ASF code into some
private repository, that would be my issue, not the ASF's - isn't it?

As long as you're the only one, yes. But it seems that several
people involved at Apache have the same issues. So they are looking
for a place to discuss and consolidate their thoughts and ideas.
Labs might not be it, and the infra lists are perceived as being too
closed for lack of public archives. Still, I don't see why this
should not be discussed on an Apache mailing list. There doesn't seem
to be a suitable one yet, so maybe it is time to create a new one?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

the very nature of allowing a large number of
remote checkins, queued up and dumped on a project all at once, almost
certainly ensures that the flood will enjoy less oversite and scrutiny
than individual patches would enjoy.  Personally I'm able to overwhelm
most conscientious httpd or apr code reviewers with just a few days of
effort, and shudder to think what would happen if I queued up all of that
for just a week or two, inflicting it all upon them at once.

And if they are queued up just for 8 hours so people can work on
the codebase during a long flight? Besides, I don't see what would
stop anyone from queueing up two weeks worth of individual patches
with SVN.
Tools are one thing, processes another. When somebody dumps too
many patches at a time, they can be veto'd just because of that
and queued up as individual patches in JIRA until they receive
proper review.

cheers,
  Roland


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to