Hi Gerolf, great, thanks for starting to commit to the labling. :-)
The RFCs are one class of relevant specs, the others are XEPs (see xmpp.org/extensions). WDYT, should we use another annotation for them (XEPCompliant) or should we change RFCCompliant to something like "SpecCompliant"?
If we'd want to output a single document with all sections having a compliance status we would probably want to use apt (http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/tooldocs/share/apt.html). There is an ant target for it. We'd have to write our own code using it. In this case I'd suggest to move all compliance related stuff from util.annotation to a new package o.a.vysper.compliance .
Bernd Gerolf Seitz (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LABS-123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerolf Seitz resolved LABS-123. ------------------------------- Resolution: Fixedoops, didn't notice i have commit karma already. so i took the liberty to commit, since it's non-crucial anyway ;)use @RfcCompliant to mark specific code elements and unit tests that implement or check RFC compliance ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: LABS-123 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LABS-123 Project: Labs Issue Type: New Feature Components: Vysper Reporter: Gerolf Seitz Attachments: rfcCompliant.patch example: @RfcCompliant(rfc="3290", section="3.1", status=ComplianceStatus.FINISHED) public class EntityConformance { ... }
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
