<<The whole fascinating debate has highlighted to me the fact  that 'words'

as such are part of an organic and living method of  communication.

Whatever 'language' is being used  these 'words'  develop with time and

take on new meanings alongside the  old.>>
Style manuals produced at the same time also differ, possibly  depending on 
the publication that the piece will appear in. For instance, the NY  Times 
Manual of Style and Usage says of compound words,
<In general , a compound that would be hard to decipher at  a glance should 
be hyphenated rather than solid.  To avoid incongruity, a  compound noun 
that is ordinarily solid should be separated when the first part  is modified 
by an adjective: "businessman" for example becomes "small-business  man",; 
"Sailmaker" becomes "racing-sail maker"; schoolteacher becomes  public-school 
teacher. When a compound modifier is formed by an adjective before  a noun 
it is usually hyphenated; "They wore well-tailored gray suits." But omit  
the hyphen when the phrase follows what it modifies.; "The suits were well  
tailored">
 
So "lacemaker" becomes "needle-lace maker"? She was a maker of  needle 
lace, or she was a maker of needlelace? 
 
The Chicago Manual of Style deals with the issue exhaustively,  in sections 
6.32 onward, but setting out a principle that, "For some years now,  the 
trend in spelling compound words has been away from the use of hyphens.  There 
seems to be a tendency to spell compounds solid as soon as acceptance  
warrants their being considered permanent compounds, and otherwise to spell 
them 
 open.  This is a tend, not a rule, but it is sometimes helpful, when  
deciding how to spell some new combination, to remember that the trend exists. 
But later it says you should hyphenate if there is any chance  of 
ambiguity, as in a "fast sailing ship" which should be hypenated to  
"fast-sailing 
ship" if it is a ship that is currently sailing fast, versus "fast  sailing 
ship" if it is a sailing ship that is capable of sailing  fast".
 
So, it would appear that ambiguity resulting  from placement in a sentence 
might require a hyphen to explain  the meaning of a term.
 
Also, has the time come when lacemaker or lacemaking has  gained 
acceptance? Or has the time of their acceptance passed? 
 
Devon

-
To unsubscribe send email to majord...@arachne.com containing the line:
unsubscribe lace y...@address.here. For help, write to
arachne.modera...@gmail.com. Photo site:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lacemaker/sets/

Reply via email to