As I understand it the photocopies were made by the original owner of a book for his/her personal use that was legal, but to remain legal they should have remained with the book. A new owner of the book could use them if required, again for personal use only, but they should not have been passed on to a third party by sale or by gift.
Brenda > All that being said, the seller did not purposefully make copies of a > publication to sell, did they? Is it unlawful to sell a piece of paper that > happens to be a photocopy? What if the papers of the previous owner were of > collectible value to someone? Brenda in Allhallows paternos...@appleshack.com www.brendapaternoster.co.uk - To unsubscribe send email to majord...@arachne.com containing the line: unsubscribe lace y...@address.here. For help, write to arachne.modera...@gmail.com. Photo site: http://www.flickr.com/photos/lacemaker/sets/
