On Jul 19, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Stephen Paul Weber <[email protected]
> wrote:
We may want to fine-tune this further in the future by putting a time
limit or inbox limit on those other input channels. It's very
unlikely
that someone is replying by XMPP or SMS to a notice that was posted 8
months ago, or to a notice that they didn't receive via XMPP or SMS.
Not as true, I reply to stuff that failed to come over XMPP, or
really old
stuff I discover, all the time.
Ditto. I'm eager to reply to old things that I find. And I actively
look for things like that on a regular basis, too. I enjoy that
in_reply_to can add context to an otherwise seemingly out of the blue
remark if a lot of time has passed.
Cheers,
-M
(Terse email sent from my iPod.)
_______________________________________________
Laconica-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.laconi.ca/mailman/listinfo/laconica-dev
