Yeah. It is really strange. Our script (perl) that we are working to replace
with LAMPro explicitly defines the top objectclass, so I have noticed users
added with LAMPro do not have this class, so our application ignored the users
existence.
What youre ultimately saying though is that something is missing from our
openldap configuration?
Sent from my Virgin Mobile phone
-------- Original message --------
From: Roland Gruber <[email protected]>
Date: 09/21/2014 10:12 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Lam-public] top objectclass in Users account type
Hi Phillip,
On 19.09.2014 18:26, Phillip Roberts wrote:
> How can I modify the Users account type to set the top objectclass with
> LamPro?
this is automatically done by the LDAP server. Do you really miss it for
new users?
Adding can be done with tree view or multi edit tool.
--
Best regards
Roland
LDAP Account Manager
http://www.ldap-account-manager.org/
Want more? Get LDAP Account Manager Pro!
https://www.ldap-account-manager.org/lamcms/lamPro
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Lam-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lam-public
