On 12 Aug 2001, Owen Taylor wrote:
> - User data stored with a structure should have an associated
> notifier.
> - Callback functions must take not just a function, but
> a function,user data, destroy notifier combination.
The first "associated notifier", is that a destroy notifier too? is a
destroy notifier the same thing as a destructor/finalizer ?
> - Data structures should be one of:
> * Immutable and refcounted.
> * Copy by value.
> * Copy by reference, reference counted, with destroy
> notification and a user data facility for maintaining
> persistant language <=> library associates.
I see there is no mark+sweep garbage collection here?
Ruby features mark+sweep.
OTOH, Ruby has no reference counting of any kind.
matju
- Re: [Python-Dev] Parrot -- should life imitate satir... Sterling Hughes
- Re: [Python-Dev] Parrot -- should life imitate satire? Owen Taylor
- Re: [Python-Dev] Parrot -- should life imitate satir... Owen Taylor
- Re: [Python-Dev] Parrot -- should life imitate satir... Rasmus Lerdorf
- Re: [Python-Dev] Parrot -- should life imitate satire? Sterling Hughes
- Re: [Python-Dev] Parrot -- should life imitate satire? Paul Prescod
- Re: [Python-Dev] Parrot -- should life imitate satire? Rasmus Lerdorf
- Re: [Python-Dev] Parrot -- should life imitate satir... Sterling Hughes
- Re: [Python-Dev] Parrot -- should life imitate satire? Mathieu Bouchard
- Re: [Python-Dev] Parrot -- should life imitate satire? Owen Taylor
- Common Language Extension API Strawman Paul Prescod
- Re: [Python-Dev] Parrot -- should life imitate satire? Paul Prescod
- Re: [Python-Dev] Parrot -- should life imitate satire? Dan Sugalski
- Re: [Python-Dev] Parrot -- should life imitate satire? Paul Prescod
