At 01:52 PM 8/22/2001 -0700, Paul Prescod wrote:
>Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >
> >...
> >
> > If you're adding null, that brings in the possibility of tristate logic...
>
>Are you suggesting something or stating that it is good that I agreed to
>add both null and boolean because now you can have tristate logic?
Neither. Merely stating that, if you have NULL, the possibility of tristate
logic is there. Whether you want to have it or not is another question
entirely, but one that can be asked now that NULL's around.
Personally I can't decide whether I like tristate or not. It's nice in some
ways, and darned annoying in others. ("Whaddya mean NULL != NULL? That
makes no sense!" :)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
