Kaixo, Li Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 01:50:42PM +0200, Juan Martorell scrijha:
> For example "morirteme" would be wrong. > > This counterexample is not the best IMHO. Google gives some results. The > Consider: "Por muy enfermo que estés, ni se te ocurra morírteme ahora." Indeed! And the reason it makes sense it is used in figurative sense (in such case the real meaning is not just "to die" but "to willingly die", eg to kill oneself; I didn't tough about that possibility. Anyway, my point was that the possible pronouns depend on meaning; and some meanings just don't make sense. As for the question if it is a problem or not; well meaningless combinations are not very likely to occur on a text; but if those automatically generated combinations are used by a spell checker suggestion, then some wrong/unwanted suggestions happen, and maybe even push aside better ones. If meaning or "existence" of a form is handled differently, and only "grammatical possibility" is intendend, then indeed the larger definition of flexion mechanisms is better (as that is also the main way how neologism are created). Can the dictionnaires used for POS tagging and for providing suggestions be different? -- Ki ça vos våye bén, Pablo Saratxaga http://chanae.walon.org/pablo/ PGP Key available, key ID: 0xD9B85466 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
