* Stephen Hahn <sch at eng.sun.com> [2006-02-23 10:19]:
> * peter.memishian at Sun.COM <peter.memishian at Sun.COM> [2006-02-23 06:55]:
> >
> > > If there aren't any others that'd be interesting for Crossbow (DR?),
> > > then I suppose it's not required. It just seems odd to me that we're
> > > effectively putting hardware into zones and the one common hardware
> > > event mechanism we've got isn't actually equipped to deal with zones
> > > -- and so rather than fixing it, we're seeing if we can just avoid
> > > using it.
> >
> > Of course, I'd never advocate that. I'd think whoever needs it first
> > (NWAM or Crossbow or ...) will need to enhance it.
>
> General purpose event channels ("GPEC") was virtualized for use in
> zones by Dan so that Greenline could use it for reliable event
> transport between svc.startd(1M) and the delegated restarters.
s/Greenline/smf(5)/ for those not aware of old project codenames...
- S.
