Hi,

According to the Wifi device list, WPA is supported for the wpi driver since 
build 77.
I have build 79 running on my system, and I want to use WPA.

First, I found that the wpa_supplicant is not installed by default.  So, I 
downloaded 
the wpa_supplicant v0.1 daemon package from opensolaris.org site.

Then, I found that the wificonfig command that's installed in build 79 doesn't 
support the WPA options, so, I downloaded the wificonfig-0.3 utility package 
from opensolaris.org site.

After I installed the above 2 packages, I tried to start the wpa_supplicant.  
However, I found
that the wpa_supplicant depends on libssl.so.0.9.7 and libcrypto.so.0.9.7.  On 
build 79, 
libssl.so is already at 0.9.8 and libcrypto is also at 0.9.8.  To workaround 
the problem, I
created symbolic links.  The wpa_supplicant also depends on 
libcrypto_extra.0.9.8.  That library
doesn't exist at all in snv_79.  So, I just created a sym link for it using 
libcrypto.so.0.9.7.
After all these, I am finally able to start the wpa_supplicant daemon.

I started it in the debugging mode:

-------------------------------
# wpa_supplicant -i wpi0 -F -dd
eapol_sm_init : malloc sm=808a7e8
EAPOL: SUPP_PAE entering state DISCONNECTED
EAPOL: KEY_RX entering state NO_KEY_RECEIVE
EAPOL: SUPP_BE entering state INITIALIZE
EAP: EAP entering state DISABLED
EAPOL: External notification - portEnabled=0
EAPOL: External notification - portValid=0
events_init:
Enter sysevent init entry
Before eloop_run
-------------------------------------

Then, I created a profile for my connection as follows:

# wificonfig createprofile home1 essid=Gamma psk=mykey proto=WPA 
key_mgmt=WPA-PSK pairwise=TKIP

When I try to connect, I got the following error:

# wificonfig connect home1
wificonfig: failed to set 'psk' for Operation not supported
wificonfig: failed to set 'proto' for Operation not supported
wificonfig: failed to connect to profile 'home1'
#

----------------------------

Any idea on how I should proceed?  Are the wpa_supplicant and wificonfig 
packages
from opensolaris out-of-date?  Would the most updated copy help in this 
situation?

Thanks,

--Karen
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org

Reply via email to