I will be implementing a power management strategy which will shutdown
cpu's, so therefore in my situation it will have something to do with power
management.

What do you exactly mean with "halt"? I suppose you are talking about gating
the clock, right?

Thomas

On 5/9/07, Bart Smaalders <bart.smaalders at sun.com> wrote:
>
> Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In cpu_offline() within uts/common/os/disp.c, there is a check on
> > whether this is the last online :
> >
> >    1232        * Don't offline last online CPU in partition
> >
> >    1233        */
> >    1234       *if* (ncpus_online <
> http://src.opensolaris.org/source/s?defs=ncpus_online> <= 1 ||
> > pp <http://src.opensolaris.org/source/s?defs=pp>->cp_ncpus <
> http://src.opensolaris.org/source/s?defs=cp_ncpus> <= 1 || cpu_intr_count
> <http://src.opensolaris.org/source/s?defs=cpu_intr_count>(
> > cp <http://src.opensolaris.org/source/s?defs=cp>) < 2)
> >    1235               *return* (EBUSY <
> http://src.opensolaris.org/source/s?defs=EBUSY>);
> >
> >
> >
> > I am wondering why this check is actually there. If the last cpu can be
> > offlined as well, then more energy can be saved.
> >
> > My first thoughts are that this is necessary in order to resume again
> > when there is something to do. If none of the processors is online, who
> > will execute the cpu_online() function. This would imply a certain
> > wakeup interrupt that will wakeup a processor and starting its
> > instructions at the cpu_online()  function. This should be supported by
> > hardware, which it probably isn't. Is this correct?
> >
> > Are there other reasons?
> >
> > Thanks, Thomas
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > laptop-discuss mailing list
> > laptop-discuss at opensolaris.org
>
> The cpu_online/offline routines have nothing to do with power
> management.  These routines are used to disable CPUs that appear
> to be developing faults, or need to be disabled for benchmarking
> purposes.  Note that Solaris halts idle cpus anyway.
>
> This might be better discussed in opensolaris-code....
>
> - Bart
>
>
> --
> Bart Smaalders                  Solaris Kernel Performance
> barts at cyber.eng.sun.com         http://blogs.sun.com/barts
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/laptop-discuss/attachments/20070509/0d8c779e/attachment.html>

Reply via email to