On Nov 22, 2007 9:39 PM, Ignacio Marambio Cat?n <darkjoker at gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 22, 2007 11:22 PM, Austin Willard <austinwi at comcast.net> wrote: > > I assume Open Solaris is equal to Solaris 10, > that is not correct, the opensolaris code comes from a version of > nevada that is newer than solaris 10, the opensolaris codebase has > also evolved a lot since then: > check http://whacked.net/2005/06/21/confused-so-was-i/ > > nacho > > _______________________________________________ > laptop-discuss mailing list > laptop-discuss at opensolaris.org >
Hello! (If all of you will excuse my butting in on this discussion from a late joiner to the fora. From an early discussion with the group at the Sun NYC offices, I would say sir you are quite correct. The code base for Open Solaris has advanced considerably since the last generally available DVD was made and provided for. In fact what's downloaded may be closer, but IMHO the contents of the download may actually be the same. Therefore everything that the Open Solaris side of the house has in its repository is indeed very new. When Number Eleven gets released any day now, in all probability it will contain three-quarters of those bits. Perhaps as close as Seven-Eighths. However this is only from the opinion of someone who has met Solaris running on a native system, and argued with a Server of theirs, not had a chance to run the system normally discussed here on a current platform. -- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com "This signature was once found posting rude messages in English in the Moscow subway."
