I think that's perfectly reasonable, but what about cases when you *have* to use callOnIdle in order to have something work. Surely those *are* bugs, if they're not documented?
-Antun Adam Wolff wrote: > I think the answer to this question is no. There are lots of cases where a > programmer may want to yield -- say in exectuing a time-consuming search. > callOnIdle is intended for exactly this purpose, where the cost of > registering and unregistering an event is too high to do on every idle > event. > > A > _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
