Glad it got integrated, and greetings from Japan! -Max
Jim Grandy wrote: > Boy, that was a long vacation :-) > > Short answer: 40532 == 40589. And 40397 == 40415, and so on... > > I think the answer is that the P4-to-SVN gateway was using working > changeset numbers rather than the real transaction changeset number (I > guess the gateway hook runs before the transaction commits, so it > wouldn't know what the real transaction changeset number was). This is > kind of a bummer if true, since that means the gatewayed svn transaction > descriptions wont cleanly map back to P4 changeset numbers. > > But the good part of it is that yes, that change was integrated over. > > p4 describe 40589 > Change 40589 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2006/03/14 14:10:53 > > Summary: Arc now matches the WHATWG specification. > > New Features: > > Bugs Fixed: LPP-1588 > > Technical Reviewer: Jim > QA Reviewer: (pending) > Doc Reviewer: (pending) > > Documentation: > > Release Notes: > > Details: > > Tests: > > Affected files ... > > ... //depot/lps-dev/WEB-INF/lps/lfc/views/LzDrawView.as#20 edit > ... //depot/lps-dev/test/bugs/lpp-1588.lzx#1 add > > --- > > And here's the corresponding entry in SVN > (http://www.openlaszlo.org/websvn/listing.php?repname=OpenLaszlo&path=%2Fopenlaszlo%2F&rev=215&sc=1) > > > >> Path: /openlaszlo/ >> Rev: 215 - Go to most recent revision >> Last modification: Rev 215 - perforce - 2006-03-14 17:10:50 -0500 >> (Tue, 14 Mar 2006) >> Log message: >> Change: 40532 >> >> User: mcarlson >> >> Description: >> Summary: Arc now matches the WHATWG specification. >> >> New Features: >> >> Bugs Fixed: LPP-1588 >> >> Technical Reviewer: Jim >> QA Reviewer: (pending) >> Doc Reviewer: (pending) >> >> Documentation: >> >> Release Notes: >> >> Details: >> >> Tests: >> >> Changes: >> >> Hide changed files >> >> New Files openlaszlo/trunk/test/bugs/lpp-1588.lzx >> >> Modified files openlaszlo/trunk/WEB-INF/lps/lfc/views/LzDrawView.as >> >> Deleted files > > On Jul 17, 2006, at 1:23 PM, Max Carlson wrote: > >> Hi Jim, >> >> When you get back from vacation, can you look into whether these >> changes made it over to trunk? >> >> 12:57:46 PM vjqak: There was a test checked in when I fixed this in >> lps-dev under /test/bugs/lpp-1588.lzx >> 12:58:14 PM vjqak: What's alarming is that this change never made it >> from lps-dev to trunk >> 12:59:07 PM benjaminatwork: Alarming indeed. So this is *already* >> checked into to lps-dev? eeps. I'll integrate the test case too. >> 12:59:18 PM vjqak: yes. >> 12:59:39 PM vjqak: The fix was made on 3.14.2006 by yours truly. >> 12:59:45 PM vjqak: 40658. >> 1:00:02 PM vjqak: sorry, 40589. >> 1:01:10 PM vjqak: I'm wondering if 40415, 40481, 40503, 40658, 40762 >> made it over... >> 1:01:24 PM vjqak: they should have, right? >> 1:04:41 PM benjaminatwork: Wait, now I'm getting so confused. The test >> case is already in trunk, and lps-dev is dead. >> 1:05:08 PM benjaminatwork: i'm getting that "we're breakign jim's >> branch management strategy" feeling. >> >> Thanks! >> >> -Max > _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
