I just posted a few with this mechanism so you can try it out -- the review mail would say this: Imported as http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/ patch.ben.BMaF.tgz and if you click on that link, it downloads the tgz for you
You can also get the individual tar with svn export http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/ patch.ben.BMaF.tgz which gives you a non-version-controlled, vanilla tgz file. -ben On Oct 12, 2006, at 3:49 PM, Jim Grandy wrote: > Ah, but they don't have to sync. They just click on the link in the > email, and get a download dialog in their browser (at least, they > will if we construct the dialog correctly). It's actually less error- > prone and more streamlined, because there's no possibility of > neglecting to add the patch to the review mail. > > jim > > On Oct 12, 2006, at 3:40 PM, P T Withington wrote: > >> I think this proposal stores less bits on hard drives but makes the >> reviewer's job more complicated (they have to sync to get the >> review changes). I prefer the existing mechanism. If there were >> some way to tell the mailing list not to archive attachments, >> perhaps that would be a good compromise? >> >> On 2006-10-12, at 15:07 EDT, Jim Grandy wrote: >> >>> I just remembered we had a possibly-complementary proposal on the >>> table as well: >>> >>> Modify the review tools to check the changeset in to Subversion >>> instead of sending it as an email attachment. >>> >>> So svn-review would do a >>> >>>> svn import patch.ptw.xPLr.tgz http://svn.openlaszlo.org/ >>> openlaszlo/patches/patch.ptw.xPLr.tgz >>> >>> And add a link to the patch to the review email: >>> >>> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/patch.ptw.xPLr.tgz >>> >>> The argument is that we would then be storing the patch once, >>> rather than transporting and storing it for each member of >>> whichever list it goes to. And yes, these files would live on in >>> Subversion, but that's arguably better than living on in many, >>> many email archives. >>> >>> jim >>> >>> On Oct 12, 2006, at 11:45 AM, P T Withington wrote: >>> >>>> We've had a few complaints about the 'review mail' noise on the >>>> laszlo-dev mailing list, especially the large attachments that go >>>> with the review submission. If no one objects, I plan to create a >>>> new list <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for review mail >>>> (and >>>> ask that reviewers direct their review requests there). If members >>>> of this list want to continue to receive review mail, they will >>>> need >>>> to join the new list. >>>> >>>> I'll send mail to the list when the new one is set up and ready to >>>> accept subscriptions. >>>> >>>> P T Withington >>>> OpenLazslo.ORG <http://www.openlaszlo.org> >>>> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] skype:ptwithy aim:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Laszlo-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev >>> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Laszlo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
